FordTechOne
Well-Known Member
Perhaps you need a lesson in economics. The interior design and materials in the Mustang are best in class when you consider it's price and performance. Your VW R model is a joke when compared with the performance of the Mustang GT.I don't think I am being unrealistic at all. I got exactly what I expected to get with the GT350.
The argument that it would take much money to upgrade the interior materials I just happen to think is an excuse to let American car builders off the hook. I also think it would take no more time or money to put the body panel on correctly than to do it wrong. YMMV.
It just so happens my Volkswagen is an R model and thus for it's category is considered a performance car and has had money spent on the performance upgrades you say it doesn't have. I have had cars from Porsche GT3's to honda civics. I have been in many cars that for less than 40,000 have way better interior quality and exterior build quality than most any American car. If you think a mustang interior is nicer than almost any VW that is your opinion. I happen to disagree.
In short I expect any car I have to be put together correctly! Seems like that is not an issue for some of you. What that has to do with being a performance car is beyond me.
Does your VW have a 435HP V8? 6 Piston Brembo Brakes? Of course not. And around a road course, the GT PP will hand your VW it's ass on a silver platter. Performance like that doesn't just happen by coincidence; it's engineered. So while Ford paid engineers to spend long days at the track to develop the chassis dynamics, VW installed a higher horsepower engine in the GTI and called it a day. That's a big difference.
It comes back to what I already stated - people want the performance of a $400,000 exotic at the price of an entry level luxury car. It's not economically feasible. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Sponsored