Sponsored

GT PP w/ eibach sportlines... No alignment needed?

2Cool

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2014
Threads
16
Messages
604
Reaction score
257
Location
Melbourne, FL
First Name
Ian
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium, PP in CO
I handed my alignment guy a sheet with the image below and the Ford specs for my GTPP. Just to ensure there were no questions.
camber%20adj.webp
Sponsored

 

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
Reading some of these comments makes me feel good I am going to Steeda to get all my suspension parts installed and they are doing the alignment:).
 
OP
OP

dannycoconuts

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Threads
9
Messages
197
Reaction score
29
Location
Glendale, AZ
First Name
Danny
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
I handed my alignment guy a sheet with the image below and the Ford specs for my GTPP. Just to ensure there were no questions.
Do you happen to have a link to that sheet?
 

2Cool

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2014
Threads
16
Messages
604
Reaction score
257
Location
Melbourne, FL
First Name
Ian
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium, PP in CO
Do you happen to have a link to that sheet?
Front
Base Coupe/Vert: -.74 +/- .75
PP / Track Pack: -1.03 +/- .75

Rear
Base Coupe/Vert: -1.19 +/- .75
PP / Track Pack: -1.50 +/- .75

FRONT
Camber — (Performance Package Coupe, Track Package Coupe)
L/R: -1.03° ± 0.75°
Cross: 0.0° ± 0.75°

Caster — (Performance Package Coupe, Track Package Coupe)
L/R: 7.21° ± 0.75°
Cross: 0.0° ± 0.75°

Toe — (Performance Package Coupe, Track Package Coupe)
Total: 0.0° ± 0.20°

REAR
Camber — (Performance Package Coupe, Track Package Coupe)
-1.50° ± 0.75°

Toe — (Performance Package Coupe, Track Package Coupe)
L/R: 0.12° ± 0.20°
Total: 0.23° ± 0.20°

Thrust Angle (All Models): 0.0° ± 0.5°
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

dannycoconuts

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Threads
9
Messages
197
Reaction score
29
Location
Glendale, AZ
First Name
Danny
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
Awesome, thanks
 

Sponsored

USAF

#GTFOsquad_0047
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
353
Reaction score
121
Location
Philly
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT, 1993 GT
got my car back on the rack...& just called, they got
LF rear 1.1 but RT rear is still 1.7.....
told the writer that I paid for this because they didn't cover under warranty so fix RR.
 

dwaleke

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
895
Reaction score
117
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Jeep
got my car back on the rack...& just called, they got
LF rear 1.1 but RT rear is still 1.7.....
told the writer that I paid for this because they didn't cover under warranty so fix RR.
I assume you are talking about camber. Camber adjustment is built into the rear suspension. Have them adjust it to the specs posted above.

Nothing special needs to be done here. Set rear camber and then front & rear toe.

Your front camber may have changed (increase negative camber) however as long as it is the same or close to the same side-to-side I wouldn't worry about it.
 

USAF

#GTFOsquad_0047
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
353
Reaction score
121
Location
Philly
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT, 1993 GT
Elbach says they can get it to -1.2 so I would like 1.2/1.3/1.4
looking at it the way it sits at 1.7 it just looks bad
 

ramairgt1

15 GT PP
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Threads
22
Messages
443
Reaction score
131
Location
NE Georgia
Vehicle(s)
'20 Mustang GT PP2
So apparently my car is out of spec...

I called Eibach and they said the front was -1.4 to -1.7 on the cars they did. Spec is -1.0 +/-.75, Both of my fronts are at -1.7, which is ok

Rear spec is -1.5 +/-.75, my LR is at -2.3 and RR is -1.9. Both in spec but too much of a difference between the 2.

They said the rear subframe might be out of alignment from when the springs were installed. They sent me a picture showing me the alignment holes used to check the rear subframe alignment. They use dowel pins at the factory to align the subframe.
He said I should not need camber bolts nor plates.

My alignment shop is going to see what they can do tomorrow.

 

Sponsored

H1 GT

Crew Chief
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Threads
28
Messages
776
Reaction score
205
Location
OK, United States
First Name
Taylor
Vehicle(s)
15 4C, 97 H1
Just had mine done.

Rear

Toe: 0.0° - was already perfect
Camber: 2.2° - no change. They were both at 2.2°, I said leave it.

Front

Toe: 0.0° (I think...never got a good answer and was told "you don't want 0." But I do...)
Camber: 1.5° - was at ~2.1° R and ~1.7° L.

I would like to find a more understanding shop when I move to OK in a couple months but this seems alright for now.
 

dwaleke

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
895
Reaction score
117
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Jeep
I would set rear to 1.5 at most.

But I agree when it's even side to side it's hard to say to change it if you don't trust the shop.

I also set front and rear toe to zero.
 

USAF

#GTFOsquad_0047
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
353
Reaction score
121
Location
Philly
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT, 1993 GT
first alignment was done and paperwork says
2015:coupe:except performance: track performance -1.7 (was red)
second time
2015:coupe:performance: track package -1.7 (green) ???

are they trying to fudge the numbers to shut me up?
 

dwaleke

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
895
Reaction score
117
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Jeep
2nd set of numbers is for the gt pp cars which technically that number is in spec.

1.7 is fine if it's the same side to side.
 

USAF

#GTFOsquad_0047
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
353
Reaction score
121
Location
Philly
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT, 1993 GT
yes I would be happy with 1.7 L/R however L is 1.1 and R is 1.7

I think that far apart and -1.5 is spec to -1.1 is under
Sponsored

 
 








Top