Sponsored

Ford Recommended Alignment Sheet - Typo

wildcatgoal

@sirboom_photography
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Threads
76
Messages
6,589
Reaction score
2,512
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
TBD
Alright, I'm going to have to try "toe out" for a track alignment next. Seems to be all the rage these days.
Sponsored

 

wildcatgoal

@sirboom_photography
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Threads
76
Messages
6,589
Reaction score
2,512
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
TBD
0 toe in the rear, "upgraded" integral links because they have less axial play than stock? Man, can I hire you to set up my car?? :lol:
:lol: Oh man, I didn't see this one yesterday. Help me (us) understand why 0 tow in the rear is bad? What research have you done and applied into what S550 (non-GT4) race cars/track cars are doing as it pertains to alignments, aftermarket parts, driving style, and track? Has any S550 race/time trial/race car driver shared with you his alignments specs? Have you been on track with your S550 at all and/or with 4 different alignment approaches (at $180 a pop) like I have to experiment with said advice? None of the above makes me an expert, just a participant in this community.

I'm looking forward to all the knowledge a former BMW owner can contribute to this forum articulated, of course, eloquently and without fault. Thanks!
 

Eritas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
935
Reaction score
404
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
:lol: Oh man, I didn't see this one yesterday. Help me (us) understand why 0 tow in the rear is bad? What research have you done and applied into what S550 (non-GT4) race cars/track cars are doing as it pertains to alignments, aftermarket parts, driving style, and track? Has any S550 race/time trial/race car driver shared with you his alignments specs? Have you been on track with your S550 at all and/or with 4 different alignment approaches (at $180 a pop) like I have to experiment with said advice? None of the above makes me an expert, just a participant in this community.

I'm looking forward to all the knowledge a former BMW owner can contribute to this forum articulated, of course, eloquently and without fault. Thanks!
I'm not sure what you want to "tow", but as far as running 0 rear "toe", (taken from the "car is unstable under braking" thread):

The S550s rear toe link is ahead of the wheel centerline and at stock ride height, the arms are almost parallel with the ground and just slightly angled downward from the chassis to the hub, this means the car toes-in under droop and barely toes-out initially before toeing-in under compression. Due to the angle of the arm, I wouldn't be surprised if there was no measured initial toe-out under compression.

Depending on how much *an S550 is lowered when running* 0 rear static toe, it's possible the car is toeing-out under droop travel under braking. Even if (the car isnt) lowered that far, he will still be in the arc of the toe link curve to not be getting toe-in under braking anywhere near as early in the droop travel if at all.

Again, his "problem" of a lack of rear stability under braking is due to a lack of stabilizing rear toe-in.


But you're free to buy whatever parts you want and run whatever alignment you want. As long as you're happy, unless you're looking to improve on your setup and go faster. :thumbsup:
 

Stuntman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Threads
5
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
488
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
many
I thought front toe in was odd for the track alignment. It should be out like the regular GT350. Why it is in for the R makes no sense.
Not necessarily. The front calls for essentially zero toe. Zero and toe-IN at the front sharpens the initial steering response, improving turn-in since the outer (loaded) tire is already turning into the direction of the turn. Toe-out requires the outer loaded tire to waste steering lock to be steering straight before THEN turning into a corner. This is why toe-out actually slows down and dumbs down the on-center feel and initial turn in, which is contradictory to most people's understanding of toe.

0.02
 

wildcatgoal

@sirboom_photography
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Threads
76
Messages
6,589
Reaction score
2,512
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
TBD
I'm not sure what you want to "tow", but as far as running 0 rear "toe", (taken from the "car is unstable under braking" thread):

The S550s rear toe link is ahead of the wheel centerline and at stock ride height, the arms are almost parallel with the ground and just slightly angled downward from the chassis to the hub, this means the car toes-in under droop and barely toes-out initially before toeing-in under compression. Due to the angle of the arm, I wouldn't be surprised if there was no measured initial toe-out under compression.

Depending on how much *an S550 is lowered when running* 0 rear static toe, it's possible the car is toeing-out under droop travel under braking. Even if (the car isnt) lowered that far, he will still be in the arc of the toe link curve to not be getting toe-in under braking anywhere near as early in the droop travel if at all.

Again, his "problem" of a lack of rear stability under braking is due to a lack of stabilizing rear toe-in.


But you're free to buy whatever parts you want and run whatever alignment you want. As long as you're happy, unless you're looking to improve on your setup and go faster. :thumbsup:
:frusty:

I'd love to have me a toe vehicle. I mean tow. :thumbsup:

I have not a single complaint about instability under heavy braking myself. Ever since, hmmmm, I went with 0 static toe in the back. Go figure. Only lowered .75" on my car, but pretty high rate spring. Must be those vertical links... has to be. :cool:
 

Sponsored

JN66

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2016
Threads
82
Messages
1,251
Reaction score
510
Location
British Columbia
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350R, 1966 Couple (347 Stroker)
So....what truly is Fords 'Recommended' track setting?
 

bellwilliam

bellwilliam
Joined
Jul 28, 2017
Threads
3
Messages
147
Reaction score
59
Location
Los Angeles
First Name
William
Vehicle(s)
17 GT350R
Not necessarily. The front calls for essentially zero toe. Zero and toe-IN at the front sharpens the initial steering response, improving turn-in since the outer (loaded) tire is already turning into the direction of the turn. Toe-out requires the outer loaded tire to waste steering lock to be steering straight before THEN turning into a corner. This is why toe-out actually slows down and dumbs down the on-center feel and initial turn in, which is contradictory to most people's understanding of toe.

0.02
so are you recommending front toe out or toe in ?

this is really confusing........
 

snaproll

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2016
Threads
2
Messages
378
Reaction score
181
Location
Naples Florida
First Name
Bruce
Vehicle(s)
350R/88LX/FR500S
At less than a tenth it doesn’t make any difference either way but out is better for turn in, no doubt.
 

Stuntman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Threads
5
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
488
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
many
 








Top