Norm Peterson
corner barstool sitter
It's really not the mining, per se. It's the sharing of that data once they have it. I probably wouldn't mind Ford getting a peek at how I use my car from time to time, but I strongly object to their sharing of that data to an entity with a different agenda who could change how they view said data without notice or restriction to either Ford or Ford's customers. For example, I think 0.5g braking is commonly interpreted as "extreme braking" by some of the insurance companies who offer things like "Drive Wise". That's today. Tomorrow they could drop that to 0.35g, where you could instantly be considered a riskier driver than you were only yesterday.Data mining is completely legal and again, in the agreed upon privacy policy. They have every legal right to data mine while you use their products and services. The only state that allows users to opt out of implied agreements in relation to data privacy is California (big bad wolf for most ppl in these forums).
Maybe in theory. But that doesn't work very well when all or most companies require you to agree to similar conditions.Again. You do. Even more powerfully so, you do with your dollar.
I know I'm not an average case as far as data mining is concerned, and I've at least hinted at that a number of times. But it's not a hard life to live, either.Then please realize that you're outside of the normal use-case on this. Most people are not going to live off the grid, as you are doing, and thus need advice that match the way their most likely to use it.
All of which is benign and not monitored in real time. Though it's still a bit irksome that Subaru can send me flyers offering to get me into one of their newer vehicles at a price being compared against some specific dollar figure for the WRX we did buy.There's always data being collected, digital or otherwise. Even when not using a digital means, for example, when you go to purchase your vehicle, there are data and statistics being drawn from that interaction such as zip code purchased, cost of vehicle, purchase type, etc.
All the way off the grid would take greater commitment than simply having a smaller on-the-grid presence than most. I get that. But it really isn't that difficult or restrictive to limit how much data about yourself can be regularly collected. Maybe it starts with realizing that you don't have to "be connected" 24/7/365.That is a fact of the data-driven world we live in now. If you don't want to have your data mined, you are 100% within your rights to do that. But going off the grid is a far greater commitment than you think, even when you've got location services turned off.
Per the original post, it seems most people are not aware of exactly what they have "agreed" to. Let alone have any idea whether such a usage agreement might ever be/have been violated by any of the other parties. The T&Cs for these agreements themselves are difficult enough for most people to read through. Let alone fully understand them.That's not to say that we should all just give up our privacy. It is to say, however, that information is king and that's a 2 way street. Know what you're signing up for, know how your data is being used, and know when that usage agreement is being violated.
Would you feel right about sharing any data you collected with anybody outside your company, short of being subpoenaed to provide it?As the vendor, I would do exactly the same thing. Ford's one and only job is to make money and figure out ways to make more of it every day. They don't owe us anything.
Norm
Sponsored