Extreme Turbo Systems - 340whp - Stock Turbo / 92 Octane

[ETS Michael]

Hey Guys,

I wanted to share with you our recent R&D dyno graph. We put down 340whp using the following modifications on 92 pump gas. I believe this may be a pump gas record for the Ecoboost Mustang.

Modifications

• ETS Intercooler
• ETS Intercooler Piping w/ TiAL BOV - Coming Soon
• ETS 3.0" Intake - Coming Soon
• ETS Downpipe - Coming Soon
• ETS Exhaust System - Coming Soon
• Cobb AP
• Tune+ E-Tune
• Turbosmart Actuator
• New NGK Plugs
• UPS Catch Can

Thanks,

Michael

Sponsored

 

[TEXAS HEAT]

Hey Guys,

I wanted to share with you our recent R&D dyno graph. We put down 340whp using the following modifications on 92 pump gas. I believe this may be a pump gas record for the Ecoboost Mustang.

Modifications

• ETS Intercooler
• ETS Intercooler Piping w/ TiAL BOV - Coming Soon
• ETS 3.0" Intake - Coming Soon
• ETS Downpipe - Coming Soon
• ETS Exhaust System - Coming Soon
• Cobb AP
• Tune+ E-Tune
• Turbosmart Actuator
• New NGK Plugs
• UPS Catch Can

Thanks,

Michael

The horsepower and torque units not being scaled linearly makes this look distorted. The numbers are certainly good, it just looks funny compared to other dyno charts I've seen with the EBM. :headbonk:

 

[mtpavelka]

HP & TQ cross at 5250 rpm. Due to the fact that HP is calculated from measured TQ.
hp = (tq*rpm)/5252

Why do they cross below 4500 rpm?

 

[TEXAS HEAT]

HP & TQ cross at 5250 rpm. Due to the fact that HP is calculated from measured TQ.
hp = (tq*rpm)/5252

Why do they cross below 4500 rpm?

Because the left and right vertical axis are not linear.

 

[ETS Michael]

Because the left and right vertical axis are not linear.

Fixed!

Thanks,

Michael

 

[Fridge]

Hey Guys,

I wanted to share with you our recent R&D dyno graph. We put down 340whp using the following modifications on 92 pump gas. I believe this may be a pump gas record for the Ecoboost Mustang.

Modifications

• ETS Intercooler
• ETS Intercooler Piping w/ TiAL BOV - Coming Soon
• ETS 3.0" Intake - Coming Soon
• ETS Downpipe - Coming Soon
• ETS Exhaust System - Coming Soon
• Cobb AP
• Tune+ E-Tune
• Turbosmart Actuator
• New NGK Plugs
• UPS Catch Can

Thanks,

Michael

Cool info! But I have some quick questions!

How many runs did y'all run prior if any?
What was the ambient temp during this run and what were your highest charge temp?
Just curious cause the heat really killed my run :/

 

[hungryhippos]

Hey Guys,

I wanted to share with you our recent R&D dyno graph. We put down 340whp using the following modifications on 92 pump gas. I believe this may be a pump gas record for the Ecoboost Mustang.

Modifications

• ETS Intercooler
• ETS Intercooler Piping w/ TiAL BOV - Coming Soon
• ETS 3.0" Intake - Coming Soon
• ETS Downpipe - Coming Soon
• ETS Exhaust System - Coming Soon
• Cobb AP
• Tune+ E-Tune
• Turbosmart Actuator
• New NGK Plugs
• UPS Catch Can

Thanks,

Michael

Glad to see you guys coming into the stang ecoboost platform, I had a ton of your bolt ons on my evo 8 and 10.

 

[TEXAS HEAT]

I think that's pretty consistent for a full bolt on car with a proper tune on 92-93, especially if the ambient temps were favorable.

What would be nice is if you could hold that 340whp all the way to 6500rpm.

 

[ETS Michael]

I think that's pretty consistent for a full bolt on car with a proper tune on 92-93, especially if the ambient temps were favorable.

What would be nice is if you could hold that 340whp all the way to 6500rpm.

We dyno'd the car in the middle of summer, so I'm not sure they were that favorable haha. I will try and compile a few logs/data sheets over the next couple of weeks.

Glad to see you guys coming into the stang ecoboost platform, I had a ton of your bolt ons on my evo 8 and 10.

Awesome!! We appreciate the support!

Cool info! But I have some quick questions!

How many runs did y'all run prior if any?
What was the ambient temp during this run and what were your highest charge temp?
Just curious cause the heat really killed my run :/

We did quite a few runs from stock to full bolt ons. I will compile some data/logs over next couple weeks and make a post for you guys.

Thanks,

Michael

 

[5.0yote]

Yeah its hard to get past the stock turbo/heads 5300-5500 drop off in power without increasing octane/timing/boost etc.

While coming in higher than stock numbers is great, the feeling after that is still the same in essence to stock, but getting their quicker. This was the feeling I got after doing CAI, IC, BOV upgrades and a COBB tune, it was like oodles of new power up to 5300 then that a typical EBM drop in power after it plateaus just at a higher number. After you get used to the new power you still feel let down by drop off the cliff long before 6500.

If you are just going for bolt-ons and tunes its a good alternative, but you will over time probably feel like I did and want more power to 6000 or 6500. I still love this platform.

Very nice to see another option in any case, more options, more commerce and choices.

 

[Tune+]

Glad to see you make it on the forums.

You should share the splash of race gas numbers too ;) hahaha.

 

[FraG]

whats the pressure drop like?

 

[Ebm]

Reliability good so far?

 

[DUNDEM]

whats the pressure drop like?

I too would like to know this as well ETS rep.

Any data or graphs?

Sponsored