Sponsored

Dyno'd my car today!

TruBlue16

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2015
Threads
28
Messages
374
Reaction score
164
Location
Central Florida
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
2016 DIB Mustang GT w/PP
Awesome numbers! Congrats!
 

sldghmr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Threads
26
Messages
483
Reaction score
109
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP, 2020 GT PP2, 2016 F-150 XLT
Vehicle Showcase
1
ok...... WOW!!!

I would've guessed high 39x to low 40x hp @ the wheels.... congrats!
 

Chameleon

Well-Known Member
Gold Sponsor
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Threads
157
Messages
11,996
Reaction score
4,264
Location
S550 INTERIOR DRESS UP
Website
www.ebay.com
Vehicle(s)
03' Cobra, 05' GT, 13' GT, 15' GT
ok...... WOW!!!

I would've guessed high 39x to low 40x hp @ the wheels.... congrats!
These #'s sound right for his mods. Nice #'s OP. I can't wait to get headers!
 

GTBOB

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2015
Threads
37
Messages
1,304
Reaction score
623
Location
Fairfield Township, OHIO
First Name
Bob
Vehicle(s)
'18 GT, Royal Crimson, 10 speed, Active Exhaust
Vehicle Showcase
1
Wow, that puts you just shy of 500hp using a 15% driveline loss calculation!
 

Sponsored

MaskedRacerX

Driver
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Threads
73
Messages
5,611
Reaction score
4,688
Location
Vilano Beach, FL
First Name
DT
Vehicle(s)
'21_JWS4XE / '21_TM3P
Wow, that puts you just shy of 500hp using a 15% driveline loss calculation!
It's actually ~508 using a 15% loss calc. :) You don't add 15% into the value that's a 85% of some other number, the math is actually 432 / 0.85 = ~508 :cheers:
 

cognizantphotos

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2015
Threads
6
Messages
328
Reaction score
69
Location
Miami
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT

MaskedRacerX

Driver
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Threads
73
Messages
5,611
Reaction score
4,688
Location
Vilano Beach, FL
First Name
DT
Vehicle(s)
'21_JWS4XE / '21_TM3P
Awesome, i wonder how much different it would be with 93.
Curious as well since I plan on running 93 (and a tune for that octane). Heck, I'm already running 93, I understand there's trivial loss with lower octane, but I'm so used to using it for my cars, figured I'd just stick with it for consistency :)
 

daltron

Rowing All Day
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Threads
52
Messages
2,539
Reaction score
786
Location
California
First Name
Jonathan
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT PP
Wow, those numbers are achievable with just OR headers, CAI, and a tune? Sick car Rushgotti!
 

Sponsored

rozay

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2015
Threads
42
Messages
920
Reaction score
151
Location
South Florida, Broward
Vehicle(s)
2015 PQ 5.0 MT
Nice op. Wonder what would it dyno with e85 tune ,Mak cat delete,cai
 

Five Oh Brian

Mustang Guru
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
1,188
Reaction score
462
Location
Pacific NW
Website
www.KorumFord.com
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
11 GT500 Glass Roof Coupe

whatsup62

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Threads
129
Messages
2,046
Reaction score
525
Location
Jupiter
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP (Gone but not forgotten).
Good numbers, yep dyno-jets read higher than all. Same mods as me, mine in sig, non Dyno-jet.
Sponsored

 
 








Top