get in line, i have customers with orders since feb.......... lolNew IM is definitely my next step. I really like the pricing of the Sniper.
no "eta" either as of right now i'm told,
we do have 350s in stock fyi
Sponsored
get in line, i have customers with orders since feb.......... lolNew IM is definitely my next step. I really like the pricing of the Sniper.
go Boss 302, looks bad ass and accomplishes the same as the sniper for less (~$400). Just did the swap in mine and had Lund re-tune...pulls like a freight train up top!New IM is definitely my next step. I really like the pricing of the Sniper.
A log won't really tell you that.That is really good to read, I feel like I actually made some progress towards fixing things.
Do you feel that from the data there is a leak after the throttle body as someone had indicated in here?
Now that intake is the Bees Kneeswe do have 350s in stock fyi
Fuel trims can tell you if you have a leak or not. His short terms are the same. Since the last longs there are long terms other than 1 now.A log won't really tell you that.
A log only tells you the air going past the meter.
And from what you had before, to now you gained 5lbs of flow at least.
His are labeled short term bank 1 and 2. He only had long term bank 1.Where on the logs do you see fuel trims. My car is also facing a similar issue with lack of power. Based on my logs I'm seeing 7° knock in higher Rpm range. I was told that is no Bueno. I'm lucky to be making 500whp as well.
On the street? How many revisions did it take it back to the timing it was seeing before? I have a GT350 here in the garage.go Boss 302, looks bad ass and accomplishes the same as the sniper for less (~$400). Just did the swap in mine and had Lund re-tune...pulls like a freight train up top!
Unless the MAF is dialed in for the leak. LOL.Fuel trims can tell you if you have a leak or not.
To be completely fair, its very possible its been loose for a while and I never noticed anything. If it wasnt for the first dyno reading 449, I wouldnt have asked for a revision or Lund to check, thats when I was alerted to the fact that the IMRCs werent opening when being called to open in the tune. Then proceeded to do the lockout install, about 3 revisions afterwards, then the redyno where I gained about 30rwhp which was to be expected from the IMRCs not opening. So its likely its been dialed in for that leak.Unless the MAF is dialed in for the leak. LOL.
I have seen it before.
But yes you are correct.
2 revisions. First one saw a max of 15*, now back in the 17/18 near the top of the rpm band. I'll put some torco in and do a pull to see what they set max at for a 93 tune.On the street? How many revisions did it take it back to the timing it was seeing before? I have a GT350 here in the garage.
I don't want to be a nuisance to Lund. I'll likely dyno it to get a baseline after the Mak inlet and then I'll add the manifold along with a fuel system.2 revisions. First one saw a max of 15*, now back in the 17/18 near the top of the rpm band. I'll put some torco in and do a pull to see what they set max at for a 93 tune.
No no no , don't spend any more money right now .... Right now go have some friggin fun with the car !!!:cheers:New IM is definitely my next step. I really like the pricing of the Sniper.
My Mak intake didn't call of a change to my 93 tune nor did adding the Sai Li fuel system .. I could see the intake maybe calling for a change in your tune ..I don't want to be a nuisance to Lund. I'll likely dyno it to get a baseline after the Mak inlet and then I'll add the manifold along with a fuel system.
Waaaaa? No change at all with a fuel setup? You threw the system on and nothing needed changing? I'm thinking of a baseline dyno now then do a dyno tune remotely with Lund with the fuel system and manifold, 93 and E85.My Mak intake didn't call of a change to my 93 tune nor did adding the Sai Li fuel system .. I could see the intake maybe calling for a change in your tune ..