Cobra jet manifold vs Gt350 manifold

[rozay]

Wonder if the longtubes helped or if that gt350 mani and gears is making him have that power. What's funny is I beat him all times on roll racing.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Sponsored

 

[RubyRedBoost]

Wow!

 

[mustang_guy]

Well first rozay your run was sae. His was std. Take his 475 run and times it by .974. Which is 462.65 is his actual numbers in sae.

 

[robw_39]

Wonder if the longtubes helped or if that gt350 mani and gears is making him have that power. What's funny is I beat him all times on roll racing.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

The headers absolutely helped his numbers... but in my experience lower gears actually dyno less so his 3:73 gears hurt his numbers...

 

[mustang_guy]

Wonder if the longtubes helped or if that gt350 mani and gears is making him have that power. What's funny is I beat him all times on roll racing.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

You are ignoring the biggest factory which matters a lot. Driver. ;) like i said hes not very consistent when we watched your video. Switch cars and see how it goes.

 

[rozay]

I'm 441 vs his 478 std

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

 

[VTECSAUCE]

Wonder if the longtubes helped or if that gt350 mani and gears is making him have that power. What's funny is I beat him all times on roll racing.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

The torque numbers are still pretty close, high end that thing really jumps up. If the torque was high too, I'd probably question what gear it was run in too. Maybe he cant drive? lol I'd like to see them both on pump gas.

 

[steph93lx]

Thanks for the info!!

I would have love to see the gt350 Rev to 8000. By the look of is curve he need to put his limiter at 8000 like yours. I know that when he was shifting to 7500 compare to your 7900-8000 rpm he was leaving a lot on the table but wow!!!

 

[mustang_guy]

I'm 441 vs his 478 std

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Again you were sae correction, his was std. Corrected on sae he is 462.65. Having full LTs still wont put you at more power then him either, im 95% sure on that too.

 

[VTECSAUCE]

Thanks for the info!!

I would have love to see the gt350 Rev to 8000. By the look of is curve he need to put his limiter at 8000 like yours. I know that when he was shifting to 7500 compare to your 7900-8000 rpm he was leaving a lot on the table but wow!!!

^This. You can clearly see a peak on your graph, on his, it abruptly ends at 7500. This thing will rev to 8k or damn near it.

 

[Ultrakla$$ic]

The GT350 with the stock TB is the way I'm going. I already have all the other supporting mods.

How is the drivability of the car with the GT350 intake? Who's car is it so I can PM him and keep from derailing this thread??

 

[robw_39]

Again you were sae correction, his was std. Corrected on sae he is 462.65. Having full LTs still wont put you at more power then him either, im 95% sure on that too.

No his 441rwhp numbers were STD his 432 rwhp numbers used SAE. So what he was saying is his best STD numbers were 441 to the GT350 IM cars 478.

 

[mustang_guy]

No his 441rwhp numbers were STD his 432 rwhp numbers used SAE. So what he was saying is his best STD numbers were 441 to the GT350 IM cars 478.

Maybe. You very well could be correct. But ill wait for rozay to confirm that since his dyno with multiple runs has that cut off.

 

[rozay]

Again you were sae correction, his was std. Corrected on sae he is 462.65. Having full LTs still wont put you at more power then him either, im 95% sure on that too.

Again I'm 441 std he is 478 std

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

 

[rozay]

^This. You can clearly see a peak on your graph, on his, it abruptly ends at 7500. This thing will rev to 8k or damn near it.

He has more power on the table for sure.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Sponsored