bullittman
Well-Known Member
I do see your point on that. At this late date i doubt if they are thinking much about it.
Sponsored
The "Model" year would be similiar to the original , april 64 to september 65. Think that's where they are going with that.
Yeah, but after changing model years in the spring and summer for years, why would they all of a sudden change to Sept for 2015? Seems like a guess, to me. And a wrong one at that.
Um to be normal again? To be actually able to order the model year during its calendar year?
According to this link:
http://www.phharval.com/home/news-and-media/build-out-start-up/ford-fleet-cars
2013 order banks opened in 12/13/11, just over 2 months before 13 production began.
2014 order banks opened 11/12/12, also just over 2 months before 2014 production and about 3 weeks after 13 orders closed.
If the 2014 goes from Nov '12 to March '14 (assuming order banks were to open on April 17th 2014) that's 16 months.
The 2015 going from April '14 to Sept '15 as you are suggesting (17 months) means for calendar years 2013 through 2015 (note that is 3 full years) there were only 2 model year Mustangs.
Isn't that 49 model years in 50 actual years?
I only watched the snippet after 58 mins. Those guys commenting on the cover rendering being "ungainly" and the actual car being better in many areas.... have those guys actually seen the car? I heard one of them is from Motor Trend, not sure who the others are.While we all know that C&D renderings on their cover are off in many ways and Chazcron's are based on spy pics that need not be taken as 100% correct...It's good to hear from the Autoline Afterhours panel (1 from Automobile Mag and 1 from Motortrend) debunk the December cover.
See the very end of Rapid Fire...58:43
http://www.autoline.tv/journal/?p=2691