I'd certainly hope that to be the case. Regardless of what the torque/power curves look like.Also, you get a bigger blip at higher engine speeds
I think in our cars T1 Palmer should be done in 4th. Going to third seemed like a waste that just unsettled the car and you ended upshifting the car right before or at the jump headed into the big T2 late apex. You can carry a lot of speed through one and track out to the grass (before the pavement ends abruptly) By the time I figured out what gear to run the track I never got to go back.I just bought one. Hopefully I'll install at weekend. Unfortunately, I can heel-toe comfortably on the street, but I am having trouble keeping a steady brake pedal while blipping. I experienced this at Turn #1 at Palmer last week, which is a pretty complex turn - curved uphill off a curved straight, blind apex, sweeping downhill corner that unloads the front. It is pretty intense for sure!
I am only doing 3-4 track days at the moment, so don't get the chance to practice under real pressure, so I am selling out! I will throw away my "purist" boxers and t-shirt!
A little bit tangential to the topic, but does NASA even suggest that getting checked off for HPDE 4 with a DCT/SMG/PDK (or a conventional torque-converter automatic, for that matter) should limit those drivers to tracking in cars so equipped until they can demonstrate proficiency with doing the rev matching all by themselves? If not, should they?I will say, for most driving organizations, rev matching is a required skill to move to the advanced group. I can't tell you how many NASA check rides I've done for HPDE 3 drivers wanting to move to 4 that haven't made it due to not rev matching(required skill in the NASA passport/log book checklist). Kind of interesting if you think about it for those drivers that accomplish it through a DCT/SMG/PDK.
There is no feedback of engine speed to the auto-blip unit. This is where the OBDII would help a lot. I think the ECU decides what that the throttle response should be relative to the throttle pedal signal.I'd certainly hope that to be the case. Regardless of what the torque/power curves look like.
Norm
Got to be honest. First time at the track I didn't get fast enough/confident enough to go that quickly at T#1. I was cautious so as to get a good straight line brake on the curved approach that I slowed below the 'threshold' for 4th. I will try that next time.I think in our cars T1 Palmer should be done in 4th. Going to third seemed like a waste that just unsettled the car and you ended upshifting the car right before or at the jump headed into the big T2 late apex. You can carry a lot of speed through one and track out to the grass (before the pavement ends abruptly) By the time I figured out what gear to run the track I never got to go back.
Not to be argumentative, but just more as FYI - I really like rallycross too, and usually run top 3-5 in local events, even won in SA once. Vehicle dynamics are way different in that discipline - speeds relatively low and constant sliding on dirt surface means that not rev-matching on downshifts really doesn't upset the chassis any more than it already is. Big deceleration into a paved roadrace turn is much different...one guy commenting that a successful rally-cross driver had won many events without doing it!

I figured. In order to keep the argument going, I was alluding to soem "accomplished" drivers don't use the technique well!:cheers:Not to be argumentative, but just more as FYI - I really like rallycross too, and usually run top 3-5 in local events, even won in SA once. Vehicle dynamics are way different in that discipline - speeds relatively low and constant sliding on dirt surface means that not rev-matching on downshifts really doesn't upset the chassis any more than it already is. Big deceleration into a paved roadrace turn is much different![]()