Sponsored

2.5" vs. 3" Exhaust

Excelerater

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2015
Threads
13
Messages
808
Reaction score
315
Location
Memphis TN
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
BBC need big pipes,my 565 and 615 uses 2.5" primary headers with 5" mufflers for track use but even my street shit had 4" Dynomax bullets...LOUD as can be,shake the ground loud ! Welcome to BigBlock world...That video was no surprise to me

For NA 5.0 2.5 is plenty but start revving it to 7500+ or add a whipple and 3" should
show better numbers.
Sponsored

 

v8440

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2016
Threads
10
Messages
268
Reaction score
48
Location
AL
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt
A little perspective. ..I had a '91 notchback with a 393 windsor. On a 200 shot it ran 9.80's at 137 and some change through a NON MANDREL BENT 2.5" system all the way out to the rear bumper. When I installed cutouts I picked up a whopping 6 hundredths. Yes, hundredths. True, I didn't rejet the carburetor, but you get the idea.
 

EJS2016

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2016
Threads
8
Messages
544
Reaction score
214
Location
Alpharetta, GA
First Name
Ed
Vehicle(s)
2016 Shadow Black GT Premium, 6A, 3.55 / '08 GT
I love low-end torque too.
Am I correct in my belief that the installation of a 3" cat-back exhaust on a stock GT will slightly decrease low rpm torque and move it up higher in the rpm range?
Appreciate members insight.
 

aschaefer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
256
Reaction score
52
Location
Bronx, NY
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium
I love low-end torque too.
Am I correct in my belief that the installation of a 3" cat-back exhaust on a stock GT will slightly decrease low rpm torque and move it up higher in the rpm range?
Appreciate members insight.
Not in any way that you'd notice while driving, however full 3" isn't really necessary unless you're running a high power FI setup
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
Not in any way that you'd notice while driving, however full 3" isn't really necessary unless you're running a high power FI setup
That and all the 3" catbacks still connect to the 2.25" neckdown, so it really doesn't matter that it's 3".
 

Sponsored

v8440

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2016
Threads
10
Messages
268
Reaction score
48
Location
AL
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt
I would be surprised if a 3" pipe after the cats affected the torque. To the extent that exhaust systems affect torque (other than through just plain excessive backpressure), it's done by complicated interactions between exhaust pulses from different cylinders, and is affected by pipe diameter and length. I think the converters are enough of a disruption to that process that no distinct pulses continue past that point.
 

EJS2016

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2016
Threads
8
Messages
544
Reaction score
214
Location
Alpharetta, GA
First Name
Ed
Vehicle(s)
2016 Shadow Black GT Premium, 6A, 3.55 / '08 GT
Just the info I was looking for - thank you all very much!
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
I would be surprised if a 3" pipe after the cats affected the torque. To the extent that exhaust systems affect torque (other than through just plain excessive backpressure), it's done by complicated interactions between exhaust pulses from different cylinders, and is affected by pipe diameter and length. I think the converters are enough of a disruption to that process that no distinct pulses continue past that point.
It would if you were able to get rid of the 2.25" connection and make that bigger. There is legitimate restriction in the resonators and mufflers.
Sponsored

 
 








Top