Sponsored

Stock exhaust back pressure

Kjewer1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
161
Reaction score
52
Location
MA
First Name
Kevin
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang, 92 Eagle Talon
Has anyone here measured the back pressure on the stock exhaust? I tested my car today and was surprised by the results. 14 psi by redline. Dropping the cat back yielded the same result, so it's in the downpipe. Considering the expansion ratio this turbine must run, that seems like too much back pressure to be deliberate (been suspicious of this cat since the blown motor pump a few quarts of oil through it last year). Should be able to easily triple that in the turbine housing. If I get motivated tomorrow I'm going to move the sensor to the turbine housing and see what's going on there. If anyone else has tested this I'd love to hear the results.
Sponsored

 

Tucsonturbos

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Threads
13
Messages
148
Reaction score
25
Location
Tucson
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang ecoboost
Has anyone here measured the back pressure on the stock exhaust? I tested my car today and was surprised by the results. 14 psi by redline. Dropping the cat back yielded the same result, so it's in the downpipe. Considering the expansion ratio this turbine must run, that seems like too much back pressure to be deliberate (been suspicious of this cat since the blown motor pump a few quarts of oil through it last year). Should be able to easily triple that in the turbine housing. If I get motivated tomorrow I'm going to move the sensor to the turbine housing and see what's going on there. If anyone else has tested this I'd love to hear the results.
This Could Be interesting! Side note, I run a muffler and resonator delete (single exit) with stock downpipe and gained roughly 1.5psi. Can't wait to see if any results
 
OP
OP

Kjewer1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
161
Reaction score
52
Location
MA
First Name
Kevin
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang, 92 Eagle Talon
I checked on turbine back pressure tonight. Back pressure peaked at 42 psi, no matter what I did. Not at all what I expected. With a measured 15 psi in the downpipe that puts turbine ER around 2:1, which is really impressive since compressor PR is around 2.5:1. This tells me there must be more left in the turbo, clearly I'm slacking.
 

Fast64ranchero

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Threads
15
Messages
375
Reaction score
129
Location
Meridian, Idaho
First Name
Walt
Vehicle(s)
63 Ranchero, 1972 Pinto, 2015 Mustang
42, I was expecting alot more, good info, thx for sharing
 
OP
OP

Kjewer1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
161
Reaction score
52
Location
MA
First Name
Kevin
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang, 92 Eagle Talon
I was expecting that much with zero back pressure from the exhaust. Still seems crazy to me after sleeping on it. Got a downpipe coming tomorrow, we'll see what that does to both pressures.
 

Sponsored

RubyRed15

Ok, so it's blue.
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Threads
89
Messages
1,769
Reaction score
450
Location
CO
Vehicle(s)
Ecoboost Premium PP
How do you measure this? Pressure gauge in the O2 bung?
 

Edkiefer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
324
Reaction score
38
Location
NYC
Vehicle(s)
XR4ti
14lb sound way high for pressure measured at down pipe.
I would of guessed a few lbs max for whole exhaust.

Could it be your cat is damaged, did you smoke oil at anytime ?
 
OP
OP

Kjewer1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
161
Reaction score
52
Location
MA
First Name
Kevin
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang, 92 Eagle Talon
The whole reason for this test was suspecting the cat was damaged. It was on the car when the motor blew last year and put a bunch of oil and water through it while it was nice and hot on a pass. Exhaust is pretty much the only bolt on I haven't done yet, and I'm not surprised that it's holding me back, just surprised by how much. :) I was hoping someone might have tested this on a "good" stock exhaust for comparison but I seem to be alone in this so far.

I drilled at tapped the down pipe, both O2 sensors are still in place so I can make pulls with no change to the tune or anything. For turbine back pressure I tapped the turbine housing. When I get the new downpipe here I'll weld a proper bung to it. Normally I'd be running pressure sensors to a logger of some kind, but I started with a spare boost gauge to save time just to get a ball park idea of where it is.
 

Edkiefer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
324
Reaction score
38
Location
NYC
Vehicle(s)
XR4ti
The whole reason for this test was suspecting the cat was damaged. It was on the car when the motor blew last year and put a bunch of oil and water through it while it was nice and hot on a pass. Exhaust is pretty much the only bolt on I haven't done yet, and I'm not surprised that it's holding me back, just surprised by how much. :) I was hoping someone might have tested this on a "good" stock exhaust for comparison but I seem to be alone in this so far.

I drilled at tapped the down pipe, both O2 sensors are still in place so I can make pulls with no change to the tune or anything. For turbine back pressure I tapped the turbine housing. When I get the new downpipe here I'll weld a proper bung to it. Normally I'd be running pressure sensors to a logger of some kind, but I started with a spare boost gauge to save time just to get a ball park idea of where it is.
I can't help on eco boost, but i have done that tests to other vehicles and like I said few lb is a lot IMO.

I was in same spot as you one time with my XR4ti, with a borla cat back exhaust, larger down-pipe but stock cat (a replacement).I never measured above 1lb or so with 17bls boost, if my memory is right.

When the cat gets damaged the exhaust note changes too, to a more woosh sound, hard to explain but just think of bad restriction,

After a while the honeycomb will melt and then break up, so if you get rattles hitting DP, its definitely bad.
 
OP
OP

Kjewer1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
161
Reaction score
52
Location
MA
First Name
Kevin
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang, 92 Eagle Talon
The cat seems to be physically intact, but who knows what condition it is in. I'll take a closer look when I get it out. Either way I'm sure this is the biggest restriction currently on the car. Not exactly a huge surprise, but good to see numbers put to it.

The airflow through the motor seems to be about all the turbo is capable of, which is another reason that I'm surprised total back pressure is so low. At any rate, if that is accurate, the only real gains we might stand to pick up should be in the form of reduced pumping losses. In the past I've been able to ballpark pumping losses using differential cylinder pressure, I may try it this time too and see if the numbers make any sense, or correlate to any gains we see. It's just math, but it can sometimes prove interesting.
 

Sponsored

ypena02

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
789
Reaction score
203
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
What is the max lbs/min you're seeing out of the stock turbo and at what psi?
 

Edkiefer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
324
Reaction score
38
Location
NYC
Vehicle(s)
XR4ti
The cat seems to be physically intact, but who knows what condition it is in. I'll take a closer look when I get it out. Either way I'm sure this is the biggest restriction currently on the car. Not exactly a huge surprise, but good to see numbers put to it.

The airflow through the motor seems to be about all the turbo is capable of, which is another reason that I'm surprised total back pressure is so low. At any rate, if that is accurate, the only real gains we might stand to pick up should be in the form of reduced pumping losses. In the past I've been able to ballpark pumping losses using differential cylinder pressure, I may try it this time too and see if the numbers make any sense, or correlate to any gains we see. It's just math, but it can sometimes prove interesting.
Yeh, maybe one of the tuners or exhaust makers will chime in on your data.

For sure cat is biggest restriction ,does the car perform ok ?
If you were able to free up even half of that pressure I am sure you feel it, but again ECU would adjust as far as boost but still i think you'd notice it a lot.
 
OP
OP

Kjewer1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
161
Reaction score
52
Location
MA
First Name
Kevin
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang, 92 Eagle Talon
I'm asking the turbo for all the boost it will make up top, but limiting it to around 23 psi peak to keep this gobshyte fuel system happy. Airflow is in the mid 40s. Boost at the top of the rpm range did drop a few psi after porting the head, which is just another indicator that the comp wheel doesn't have anything left under these conditions.

Edit> Looking at the last log I took, 7k rpm is 43 lbs/min and 17-18 psi.
 

ypena02

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
789
Reaction score
203
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
Not bad at all for a stock turbo, thanks for the info!
 
OP
OP

Kjewer1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
161
Reaction score
52
Location
MA
First Name
Kevin
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang, 92 Eagle Talon
It seems to be similar in capacity to an EVO3 16g, obviously, but if these back pressure numbers are right, the turbine side is a vast improvement. When I ran 10.31 at ~130 on an EVO3 turbo in my Talon, airflow was 42 lbs/min at 19-20 psi at redline, but back pressure was 40-80 psi depending on what I was doing. It ran the best at ~45 psi back pressure. That would have been with 0 psi at the turbine outlet of course, the "exhaust" was a single 3" bend. So that shows the difference in turbine expansion ratios. Also noteworthy, no difference whatsoever between that 3" bend and a 2.5". 3" is always the standard, and there's nothing wrong with going bigger, but I've been able to put 103 lbs/min through a 3" downpipe for reference. :)
Sponsored

 
 








Top