Search results

This car is just beautiful in person. The pictures everyone has seen really do not do it justice. Here are some aerial shots I took. :thumbsup:

OP, you can make the 4 hour drive to see the silver GT at the Cincinnati Auto Show running through this weekend. It is worth it to see it in person. Pictures do the car no justice.

Wow, those white wheels actually look great on silver. :love:

That fully painted diffusor looks even more hideous than the red one we've seen. :barf:

All the rear end needs is that ducktail spoiler from the widebody kit photoshop! :hail:

OP look at the strut towers. You can see the engine placement is the same as current car. Boo Ford.

3.5EB would be possible but that is probably reserved for the Taurus SHO. 5.0 wouldn't fit plus the Fusion is FWD architecture and it does not have the same suspension as the 2015, not even close. The currect Focus chassis can already accommodate AWD. Does Ford want to spend extra dough on...

How is it that we haven't seen better pictures of this car/color yet?

^I'm definitely interested. The problem is I've heard nothing new about the Focus RS and have seen no spy shots or anything. :( IMO the 2.3 needs to find its way into a Fusion ST with a 6 speed manual. :hail:

The point of this thread (which I don't think any one has gotten) is why did Ford switch to the NA 3.5L with the new F-150 and keep the NA 3.7L in the 2015 Mustang. The F-150 is still heavier than the Mustang and generally the Mustang and F-150 share the same engines.

I'm really beginning to think either Mulally or some of the higher ups at Ford hate Lincoln. It just makes no sense. The interior on the 2015 F-150 is nicer than the 2015 Navigator. The 2015 F-150 gets a new steering wheel that looks really nice. The 2015 Navigator gets the same steering...

:confused::confused::confused:

Awesome

The freaking Focus ST has heated Recaros. There is no excuse for this not to be available on 2015 Mustang Recaros.

Looks like the front of the seats is the only thing that changes color. Everything else is black. Ehh.

Engine Cover: It won't have the Ecoboost badge, but it has Ecoboost written on the cover.

I never said the 3.5 Ecoboost. The F-150 is replacing the NA 3.7 with the NA 3.5. I'm wondering why Ford did not also do this with the new Mustang, downsize the NA 3.7 to the NA 3.5? If it makes sense for the F-150, shouldn't it make sense for the Mustang considering the F-150 will still...

^Lowers the entry price on the Mustang or F-150? I would think the 3.5L would be cheaper to produce than the 3.7L?

With the announcement of the new 2015 F-150 replacing the 3.7L V6 with the 3.5L, I'm wondering why Ford didn't also do this with the Mustang? It would leave more room to make the Ecoboost a more premium engine choice. Any thoughts as to why Ford is sticking with the 3.7 for the Mustang and...

You're trying too hard. That's Mulally from the GMA reveal.