I agree about the mileage. I was speculating. I thought the V6 would be better. At $3/gal., I might be underestimating the gas cost. Many insurers increase premiums for larger engines, and the GT, especially for new clients and younger drivers.
If to do were as easy as to know what were good to do, chapels had been churches and poor mens cottages, prince's palaces.
These are the ways the GT costs more than a V6, assuming a base GT and approximate mileage (I don't really know the V6 or GT mileage):
$8000 MSRP
$560 additional sales...
I test drove one of those the other day. It was white. It was a great car. I loved it. I almost wanted to switch to a convertible because it was so nice, even with the auto and 3.15.
I haven't bought one yet. I've just test driven them, though some of my test drives have been fifty or more miles. I'd love to by the eB PP if it would suit my needs. It's a great package.
I've mentioned the first gear so many times because I'm trying to get someone who owns a eB to comment on...
I wasn't implying. You inferred.
This is interesting: http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/2015/long-term-road-test/2015-ford-mustang-gt-should-we-have-gone-ecoboost.html
Stam, you encourage me. I watch what your opinions are and I'm glad the V6 works for you. I hope it will work for me. I'm mostly afraid of not getting newer technology. But I really didn't care for the eB I drove overnight. The first gear was a drag.
It's the first gear. The first gear is flat. From a stop light the turbo doesn't come on until you're through the intersection and in second gear and by that time you can't pass the Accord in the left lane.
And what do they mean, the Recaros are well worth it? By the time you've paid for the...