I'm afraid "dealer prep" is going to mean prepping the tires and the clutch... if you know what I mean. Especially if you're ordering from an out-of-state dealership like I am.
Not necessarily. I think they chose that lower grill for the LE & 50th package because the "fangs" would look out of place in conjunction for the corralled upper grill.
I think the only one of those things that may be on the car but is missing from the order guide is the rain sensing wipers. But adaptive cruise control, collision mitigation, and rain sensing wipers are all part of the same package, so I wouldn't be surprised if they're all mutually exclusive.
The only options that are not on the LE are adaptive cruise control and the rear parking assist sensors. It comes with a backup camera. The seats aren't Recaros because original Mustangs didn't come with anything like Recaros (this is a 50th anniversary tribute car). But the seats that are...
I can tell you, coming from a 94 GT, I am pumped as hell about the customizable interior lighting! Also looking forward to that exterior pony projection lol.
It appears that the cap will be the same for the GT. The EcoBoost will have a running horse instead of "GT".
50th package EcoBoost:
Limited Edition/50th package GT:
Fuelly.com is a pretty good resource to get real-world gas mileage information. Here are the links for the 2013 & 2014 Mustangs:
http://www.fuelly.com/car/ford/mustang/2013
http://www.fuelly.com/car/ford/mustang/2014
If you click on a car and go to the profile, it will list the engine type &...
Yeah and I'm sure there will be a regulation someday that will require everyone to have a self-driving car. In the meantime, I imagine the self-driving cars will be really slow and irritating to us real drivers.
Thanks for explaining it, but geez it seems like we are really nitpicking here about an insignificant thing. Topnotch seems really concerned about being "right" about this all along when all I wanted was official confirmation.
And the one you posted is a pre-production car as well... they all are at this point. So your referencing those images as proof was just as inconclusive. We didn't know for sure. At least we do know now.