Search results

Don't forget the (ever-so-slightly) larger engine: http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1696370#post1696370

I vaguely remember reading one-quarter and three-quarter used as the picture angles for car photography. Three quarters would be an angle that shows mostly the back and a little of the side of the car. One quarter is mostly the front and a little of the side. Not sure where I remember reading...

They labeled this other picture as Kona Blue, but I don't think it's the same car: http://www.ford.com/cars/mustang/2018/#gallery-16 Also looks nothing like the previous Kona Blue, so I'm not sure if I believe the label.

Not a full car picture, but here's a picture of those wheels on a blue model (not sure if Kona or Lightning): http://www.ford.com/campaignlibs/content/dam/ford_com/en_us/mustang/us/wired/features/performanceandtech/18MST_wheels_01_large.jpg

That makes sense for the 6th dash: base, 4 premium aluminum and a carbon fiber.

Unless I'm relying too much on website consistency, there's a chance for an unannounced dash pattern. On the first link's pop-up, it says there's 6 dash options, and the second link only lists 5: http://www.ford.com/cars/mustang/2018/#gallery-18...

For #4, check out Ford's 2018 Mustang page. Under the "cockpit goals" section, click the plus sign near the middle vent. It reads: "The instrument panel surround has been refreshed with four new aluminum finishes: Silver Arrow, Engine Spun, Angled Brush and Linked Graphite. There’s also a...

I'd say that Boss 302 article is as accurate as people claiming 455hp/755hp was leaked on the digital dashboard.

Nice to see actual stats on engine and transmission breakdown, thanks!

I still think the numbers are coincidence. I thought they were just trying to show the cool blue effect behind the needles, so it needed to be a non-idle rpm/speed. Also, the redline is probably different on the second image since it could be the ecoboost in that image, but GT in first. Current...

First picture. Does the width of the tire in the first picture say 255? If so, that may already have PP.

I put 470, based off the existing Power Pack 3.

This one is labelled Kona Blue in the press release:

Definitely not. Look at the captions of the pictures in Ford's press release. At least 3 of the wheel types are labeled as GT PP: https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2017/01/17/new-ford-mustang-design-technology-performance.html

1964.5 and 289 refer to the original Mustang. I'm pretty sure it had a 289ci option. EDIT: re-reading your post; I think you already implied that actually :)

True. I was comparing the temp, odometer and miles to empty to see if it was the same model in the picture. Now that I see the odometer's reading is intentional, it's likely fixed values for the pictures and doesn't mean it's the same model. So the DI + PI (confirmed on website), along with a...

I noticed that too, but it isn't in all the pictures. Maybe it switches when you go to S+ mode?

Looks like it. It just updated to say it'll be live shortly.

Digital dash looking good :)

I don't think it looks bad, but doesn't look stellar either. Definitely in need of better quality pics for better judgement. Some of the earlier posts with the photoshopped colors look good too (http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1681459&postcount=183). The color accuracy in the...