Search results

You need one more Mustang to pull off the "four horsemen of the apocalypse thing. :)

^ Fair points, I suppose, but I have to believe that the 400+ft-lbs of torque that the GT350 is claimed by Ford to have will still ferociously pin you back in the seat when you stomp on the "go" pedal. :D

PALE RDR SNO PONY BLIZZRD WHTE HOT MIRAGE

My thoughts: SVT S550 CHS SVT 5P2L FPC F EQ MXA VOODOO 186K MPS WAY BACK

Yep. Lots of more important info on the GT350 yet to be released by Ford, pricing information not the least. The full list of options and standard equipment also being pretty important too.

I can't believe there aren't musicians from LA metal bands climbing over each other to buy it. ;)

If I get a run around from dealers in northern VA, I will buy one from Brian and drive it home. :D

^ Brian, thanks for your integrity and commitment to customer service.

^ I hope you're right.

Makes me wonder if Ford will have some sort of Anniversary badging package that replaces the cobras with Tri-bar ponies. I won't hold my breath, but it would be a cool option.

I look forward to hearing James May whine endlessly about why he doesn't like it (apart from not being available in RHD) :D

Looks good, sounds good; I've got no issues with it. :)

Steve, BD, James, thanks guys.

So for DD purposes two questions come to mind: (a) what all-season tires would be good for fall/winter/early spring driving and (b) does it seem likely that Shelby American will produce a set of classic-looking rims that would fit the new GT350?

The car is designed to be driven. If I buy one, it will get driven, on a daily basis - at least while the weather is good.

Very glad you're OK.

Yep.

So far, nothing of any consequence except that apparently it only comes with black wheels. Brake dust be damned, Ford needs to give their customers alternatives for vehicles at this end of the price range.

Looks ok to me. The PP version with the extra dash gauges would look a bit cooler but I've got no issues with red and blue together like that.

So a general engineering question does come to mind, though. Since an FPC has less rotational mass and can presumably generate more horsepower with less effort than a CPC, wouldn't that make an engine that uses an FPC at least marginally more fuel efficient than an engine of similar displacement...