Its a soft limit that will be used primarily to control the RPM to 7350, which is less than the 7500 hard limit. it won't hit 7500, atleast not for any significant amount of time other than briefly overshooting the soft 7350.
Temperatures are different for the engines oil temps, autos start lowering limits at a lower oil temp, but ultimately they both use the same RPM limits at higher than normal operating temps.
Under normal operating temps all RPM limits are the same for both transmissions 7350.
A hard cut would be fully cutting spark or fuel. Inducing a sometimes harsh bouncing of the RPM off a set limit and hysteresis if this is the only RPM control in place.
A soft limit is a slower cut of a combination of spark, fuel, and (eventually just) throttle and the RPM will be held steady...
All the information about a 19 6 speed vs a 19 A10 rev limiter.
Manual on left and auto on the right.
Transmission operation temperature is slightly different for high temps, thats about it.
in reference to the screen shot in post #15- I am Not sure why tuners insist on changin the entire rpm...
IDK why choosing it now matters. They all will have to be tuned. Still has to figure out how to do that. Once they are all tuned figure out how you want the cams to phase.
-Theres 28 tables and 28 inverse tables for torque to load translation/vise versa, one for each mapped point. These are based on indicated TQ at stoich AFR, MBT Spark, and STD conditions. So not something you can measure and just enter into the table. Certainly this model has changed with your...
I think this is a good first step in understanding what mapped points, distance tables and arrays you want to setup. Plus how to set them up. Its keeping it simple.
I think you are still tuning MP 19 though and have a bit more to go before you have just a single mapped point tuned.
MP OP was...
Modify driver demand to what the ECU is saying engine brake torque is or vise versa.
Driver demand should look like a dyno graph. I'm referring to the torque line, NOT THE HP line as it seems like people confuse what I mean by saying dyno graph. But at this point the basic "fix" is to just...
Correct, load, MAF, desired load, desired MAF they are not close, but look at calculated MAP and estimated MAP form the TB. You are not fixing those relationships with the SD, and I have tried saying that a while ago.
I'd call the SD for MP 19 good. Unless you hook up a sensor and find both...
After about 3100RPM all points from both the throttle model and calculated MAP are from the 100% VE slope for the calculated MAP and Barometric pressure is limiting MAP for the TB model. This is what my post showed. Your snip shows 4000+.
It's a disagreement on the airmass side as it seems to...
The problem is you can increase the pressure the MAF translates too, and we have right up to baro metric and even more 32inHg vs fixed at 30 baro, but you can't tell it more MAF than the sensor is reporting is there. So the only way to correct it is bring the Des. MAF down via the torque...
The patterns based on RPM you can quickly see calculated MAP vs Estimated MAP with this is good. MP 19 corrected calculated MAP(left) vs Estimated MAP(right), eliminating points from lower RPMS going to higher RPMS.
Remove some of the lower RPMS.
Removing more of the lower RPMs and you can...
Have you tried setting the air charge multiplier table to the maximum air load you are seeing in that MAP? This is for making MAF and desired MAF line up. It may have an effect on the TP MAP estimate and calculated MAP lining up as well.
I believe the maximum load at WOT tables are the ones...
SD in a boosted application is a little different once in boosted areas.
There's the push back ratio of different cam angles that can limit the maximum VE slope, which can throw things off of not filtered out.
This is basics of tuning the SD model.
I just do +/-250, usually that covers the RPM point some places, some logs, require a larger spread.
This is making the calculated MAP match the estimated MAP from throttle body. It is always best to make both match a MAP sensor.
Heres my completed sheet with all RPMs set up in tabs, filtered +/-250rpm and MP19>90%. The lower RPMS didnt hit MP19 much so I filtered all that I could.
Looking through this you may see what I did.
Curves all go away from 100% VE at these angles.