Search results

This thread needs to get deleted. Too many emotions involved to have a logical debate.

Truth!!

1/4, straight line they're not that far off from each other.. On the road course, I highly doubted the SS can beat a GT350 especially with the long gears and high redline.. Plus the made the GT350 for the tracks anyways. Never drove a GT350 but I did drive an SS which had an insane amount of...

I had an EB.. traded it in for a base GT and couldn't be happier. Putting a bigger turbo will def. strain the little motor and maybe a money pit with supported mods.. Also, kiss your warranty goodbye and that's the case with a tune. Even if you run 10 secs, watch a few exhaust videos on the GT...

You're referring to drag, straight line racing? What are the GT350's doing in the 1/4? SS Manuals with time slips are getting 12.3 highest and the highest auto is 11.9 (stock of course) http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=427506&highlight=fast+list I would think the GT350 will be...

Going by the real times from Camaro owners the auto SS will probably edge out the GT350. Manual for Manual, it is def a drivers race if both cars are stock IMO. GT350 - ~ curb weight 3781 lbs, 526 HP, 429 torque SS - ~ curb weight 3650 lbs, 455 HP, 455 torque On the track the GT350 will have...

So far all the youtube videos are stock Camaros.. at the tracks, roll racing, going against a hellcat, etc. Time will only tell when the Camaros start modding like the 5.0's. Both cars are awesome, leave it at that.

Camaro fan on Mustang6G? lol Honestly, I never cared for the Camaro's until I drove a Gen 6th.. I'll give you that, the car is def. a beast with an insane amount of torque! But, I seen GT's with torque converters, bolt-ons, tunes run in the 11's easily so modded for modded, as of now I...

C'mon folks, why can't we all get along? We're all grown adults here.. save the hate for the IMPORTS if that!

That's is pretty damn cheap but I bet they put a bunch of incentives no one qualifies for.. I highly doubted they are discounting 7-8k.

I searched just for the fun of it.. Nothing but loaded 2SS's on the lot going for at least 45k. Most folks will want a good deal on a 1SS with just exhaust and rims. Wonder why the Camaros are falling behind on sales ey.. lol

SOB... luckily it wasn't me be cuz I would have went off! Nothing is worse than reckless driving/riding and don't even have the audacity to apologize??!

Sorry to hear, but most importantly you and your wife is okay. She'll get fixed to your perfection, have faith bro.

Damn, that is TUCKED! It looks good! don't get me wrong but you're right it is subjective and I like some clearance between tire and fender for a Mustang. This is perfect to me.. Steeda springs

looks good bro! For the rears, I don't think you can even fit 2 fingers back there lol That's probably the lowest I would go.. Bagging sounds good but also expensive.

Well said. Even if we have different opinions in terms of what looks good for the Mustang and in your case, you can have any look you want.. That is badass for sure.

Didn't Car and Driver tested the Focus RS to be about low to mid 13's? http://www.caranddriver.com/ford/focus-rs Two different platforms.. the RS should focus on the GTI's, STI's, Golf's, 370Z's, etc. since they're pretty much the same platform. If they made the focus RS to be faster than their...

See that's the difference.. your car looks really good but to me, is it really the best look for the Stang parked/driving? Other cars I would def consider it but the GT is all about performance to me (as one day I'm going to mod) and I think having a performance muscle car with that bagged...

8 years ago, I was around import guys.. I had a G35, lowered it where I can barely fit a finger between the tire and the fender. Sure it looked nice but I will always remembered: A 2008 black Shelby GT500 roaring past us. It wasn't lowered no lower than an inch at most. Big bad V8, deep exhaust...

What was some of the noticeable differences?