Search results

Nice job!

Not a bad problem! and here's the TQ dyno graphs :headbang: Strut: Rear shock:

Or, you could keep the 2011 and also buy a 15/16! ;)

Sounds great! Also guys, here is some food for thought :cheers:. Here are the dyno graphs for the HQ lineup. Once Ryan and I get our hands on the TQ graphs, I'll be posting them up/emailing them out to those of you that requested them. HQ strut: HQ rear:

You should stop by, sometime! I'll take you on a tour, so you can get the full Ridetech experience :D.

Thanks! I personally would have no problems putting the Fox shocks up against any other brand out there as a test, and still be confident in them. They're solid. Although a little different of a configuration, I've had the HQ coilover kits on my Mach 1 and Fox body... and they're completely...

Sorry, I didn't even think to address that. We valve our RQ/HQ series shock light on the compression side. Since we're dialing in the spring rate, the compression is controlled more, by the spring itself. The rebound is valved on the stiffer side. We could put a double adjustable knob on the...

Drooling.... :cheers:

If you are going to keep the car primarily on the street, I would stick with the HQ's. They have a great amount of adjustment that can make the car perform like a daily driver or something that is a bit more.... "spirited" seems to fit that description :cheers:. It's not uncommon to see the...

Thanks for the good words! We'll make sure that you stay updated on everything :cheers:.

At the moment, we don't have any plans for these. One reason being, the Fox shocks that we use have alot more adjustability, over the electronic style that only have a couple of settings. The HQ (single adjustable) have roughly 25 clicks of adjustment in each shock, which allows you to make...

No problem!

Those are sweet!

Drooling... :thumbsup: