Sponsored

What you think of the Pro-kit front only slight rake? *PICS*

ero 5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
63
Messages
772
Reaction score
112
Location
Bay Area, CA
First Name
Eric
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang gt 5.0
Niche gt5 M/T street comp 305/35/20 in rear 255/35/20 in front. With the fat rears sticking out I dont think the pro kit woulda worked in the rear so I just installed the pro kit springs in the front, kept the PP springs in the rear. Has a slight rake. I think it looks killer, couldnt be happier with how it came out, and think i'll be keeping it this way. the front offset is a little off, I put 5mm spacers, but might go bigger to flush it out a little. What you guys think overall? :ford:











Sponsored

 

TiE2000

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Threads
22
Messages
350
Reaction score
45
Location
Houston, TX
Vehicle(s)
2015 DIB GT Premium, with saddle interior
Looks really good. These cars look fantastic with a slight rake. I'm looking to go a bit lower all around. Got some off set springs from CJ pony. 1.5 front and 1.0 rear. They look to be a rebranded eibach sportlines front and pro's rear.
 

AMWill

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
393
Reaction score
107
Location
Malvern, PA
Vehicle(s)
2014 Track Pack 5.0
Niche gt5 M/T street comp 305/35/20 in rear 255/35/20 in front. With the fat rears sticking out I dont think the pro kit woulda worked in the rear so I just installed the pro kit springs in the front, kept the PP springs in the rear. Has a slight rake. I think it looks killer, couldnt be happier with how it came out, and think i'll be keeping it this way. the front offset is a little off, I put 5mm spacers, but might go bigger to flush it out a little. What you guys think overall? :ford:











I'm loving it man!

I was definitely expect to like it better lowered all around, but with your setup I really do like it this way!

Good work :cheers:

-Will
 
OP
OP
ero 5.0

ero 5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
63
Messages
772
Reaction score
112
Location
Bay Area, CA
First Name
Eric
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang gt 5.0
With the 19's I was originally gonna lower it all the way around, but with the 20's filling up that rear well, I decided to just do the front and couldnt be more happy with the results.
 

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
Nice! What are the offsets on your wheels?
 

Sponsored

DR_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Threads
11
Messages
669
Reaction score
261
Location
In a van down by the river
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
like a complete jerk
These cars need a raked stance, at least in my opinion. I'm going to put Sportline springs in the front and keep the Pro kit springs in the rear to get that look


car looks hot
I'll buy your front Pro Kits if you do this. I want to do like the OP did.
 
OP
OP
ero 5.0

ero 5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
63
Messages
772
Reaction score
112
Location
Bay Area, CA
First Name
Eric
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang gt 5.0

WKT

I Bleed FORD Blue!
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Threads
14
Messages
666
Reaction score
254
Location
Hilton Head Island SC
First Name
Keith
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT350 Lead Foot Grey
I like it, I was waiting to see somebody do this, I agree these cars look killer with a forward raked stance. :thumbsup:
 

NewSVO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
665
Reaction score
139
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
Guard boost premium 6mt
They are 20 x 8.5 +35mm fronts, 20x10 +45mm on rear
They don't poke because they're fat, I have 20x11 with 315s with zero poke, it may be the offset and/or the stance as to why it pokes.
 

Sponsored

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
They don't poke because they're fat, I have 20x11 with 315s with zero poke, it may be the offset and/or the stance as to why it pokes.
What are the offsets on your wheels? You have Forgestar's, right?
 

AMWill

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
393
Reaction score
107
Location
Malvern, PA
Vehicle(s)
2014 Track Pack 5.0
With the 19's I was originally gonna lower it all the way around, but with the 20's filling up that rear well, I decided to just do the front and couldnt be more happy with the results.
I'm with you on that one ero,

You definitely made the right choice.

Let me know if you ever need anything!

-Will
 

SuperSnake

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2014
Threads
38
Messages
275
Reaction score
13
Location
Bucks County, PA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
Now, that's an interesting idea. I have the same situation. 20" wheels, concerned about back, if I lower it.

So, maybe just front.

Any issues doing that? Handling?
 
OP
OP
ero 5.0

ero 5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
63
Messages
772
Reaction score
112
Location
Bay Area, CA
First Name
Eric
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang gt 5.0
Now, that's an interesting idea. I have the same situation. 20" wheels, concerned about back, if I lower it.

So, maybe just front.

Any issues doing that? Handling?
no issues so far. seems to handle the same. I do have to adjust the headlights though lol
 

SuperSnake

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2014
Threads
38
Messages
275
Reaction score
13
Location
Bucks County, PA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
no issues so far. seems to handle the same. I do have to adjust the headlights though lol
You are joking, right? It's not that extreme, is it?

One follow-up - if doing just the fronts, think it'd be better to go with the original Steeda's instead? They only have a 1" drop. Not sure if the extra .1" or .2" (or whatever it is with the Eibach's or new Steeda's) will make much of a difference ?
Sponsored

 
 








Top