Atlas1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2018
- Threads
- 20
- Messages
- 2,892
- Reaction score
- 4,880
- Location
- Everett, WA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 Audi S6, 2021 Mach 1 'M1985'
the vaccines do not prevent infection, correct. they were originally sold as that yes but no one even pretends thats true anymore. i don't see the confusion in that statement. if they prevented infection, we wouldn't be seeing cases rise to the levels they are, and we wouldn't be seeing so many 3x vaxxed individuals testing positive. the only argument for the vaccine is that they potentially lesson the symptoms after infection. and they do lose effectivity, apparently after only months. these are not my opinions. these are now official positions of even the pharma companies.Wait…
on the one hand you’re saying that the vaccines don’t prevent infection, but also claiming that the vaccines “wear off” (which is true).
Do you not see what you’ve done there?
If they don’t work, how exactly do they “wear off”?
in fairness, that isn't a ringing endorsement of the vaccines for individuals that are not in an at risk category. that tells me that the shots will always be behind the newest variant. if you can come up with a shot that prevents infection against the next variant thats coming, you have my interest. but i don't need a vax for previous variants. and if they don't stop infection of the current threat, i'm not statistically at risk for that threat, what exactly is the need to get one?I‘ll quote a passage from the link at the bottom.
Please note, they’re specifically referring to the reduced risk of INFECTION.
In fairness, this article comes from September of this year and probably doesn’t account for Omicron data.
“According to the UK's Office for National Statistics, the AstraZeneca vaccine is 67 per cent effective against infection with Delta, while the Pfizer jab is 80 per cent effective.
Other preliminary research suggests there isn't much difference between the two, and that they both reduce the risk of infection by 80 per cent.
Estimates for vaccine effectiveness against infection vary considerably from country to country, and depend on the type of vaccine, the prevailing COVID-19 variant, and the time elapsed since the second vaccine.
Estimates vary from around 55 to 80 per cent, with most hovering around the 60-70 per cent mark.”
yes the virus was created deliberately in a chinese lab. we even know the likely lab. this is not controversial other than to those that feel it is their sacred job to defend the ccp. note i did not say that they created a biological weapon to kill 0.5% of the population. my point was if they are fucking around with viruses and cannot keep from poisoning the world then they must be eliminated. the world simply can't have a communist state involved in this type of behavior if they can't be trusted to not fuck up. btw, our own government has hinted that the lab leak theory is being taken seriously. you're not sitting around thinking this was a product of bat soup or whatever BS story we were fed 2 years ago, right?Now, onto the claim re: China.
You honestly think they deliberately created a virus that only kills about 0.5% of the population? Seems like a really poor quality biological weapon to me. You‘d think they’d ramp it up a bit. Never mind the fact that the virus shows all the hallmarks of a virus that evolved naturally. To the point that if a person were to create this deliberately, there’s much simpler ways of going about it. Much less troublesome.
also, 0.5% death rate. we are supposed to shut the world down and mandate medical treatments for every human on earth under threat of force, for 0.5%? that doesn't add up sorry.
Sponsored
Your true colours shine through clearly