Long Tube Headers

[Enoch]

Comparison pic side by side please!

There you go

Sponsored

 

[Enoch]

Go go go!
Estimated time for completion? I'm saying Saturday night :headbonk:

Having a day off tomorrow Maybe a week on Saturday...

 

[Manders Mustang]

Having a day off tomorrow Maybe a week on Saturday...

Ah, it's killing me enough having not installed my mods for 2 weeks! :frusty::lol:

 

[McDoodle]

Ooooo .... nice. They make the factory effort look a bit ropey!

I assume something goes between the first and second primaries? ..... engine mounting? ....

Look forward to the finished pictures, should look well cool .

 

[Enoch]

Ooooo .... nice. They make the factory effort look a bit ropey!

I assume something goes between the first and second primaries? ..... engine mounting? ....

Look forward to the finished pictures, should look well cool .

Yes... engine mount..

Probably the most difficult component to remove up to nowaddle:addle: just 4 bolts, but access is tricky:frusty:

 

[hinch]

looking forward to hearing the difference will help me decide if I can be bothered with them or not

 

[Enoch]

looking forward to hearing the difference will help me decide if I can be bothered with them or not

I'm not fitting them for sound, I'm fitting them for BHP......even if it is wasted on an auto

 

[Manders Mustang]

I'm not fitting them for sound, I'm fitting them for BHP......even if it is wasted on an auto

Not if ur racing Gibbo it aint!

 

[hinch]

from what I understand BHP gains will be minimal and could have achieved similar by just swapping out the standard cats for some low restriction cats simple cut and weld on standard mani's.
No doubt it'll be slightly higher having LT's but we're not talking alot.

 

[Manders Mustang]

from what I understand BHP gains will be minimal and could have achieved similar by just swapping out the standard cats for some low restriction cats simple cut and weld on standard mani's.
No doubt it'll be slightly higher having LT's but we're not talking alot.

Think Gibbo said these were good for 40+ bhp easily, tune will definitely help the gains ;)

 

[hinch]

Think Gibbo said these were good for 40+ bhp easily, tune will definitely help the gains ;)

yeah what i'm saying though is it comes mostly from the derestriction of the better cats over the actual tubes themselves.

 

[Enoch]

from what I understand BHP gains will be minimal and could have achieved similar by just swapping out the standard cats for some low restriction cats simple cut and weld on standard mani's.
No doubt it'll be slightly higher having LT's but we're not talking alot.

We'll see

 

[Enoch]

Think Gibbo said these were good for 40+ bhp easily, tune will definitely help the gains ;)

A chap in NZ is running these headers, with 100 cell cats, a CAI, full 3" system and a tune, and he's at 516 BHP at the flywheel...

I'll be running a similar set up apart from 200 cell and a 2.5" system, so I'm not expecting as much... If I get 465 to 475, I'll consider it money well spent;)

 

[Centurion07]

A chap in NZ is running these headers, with 100 cell cats, a CAI, full 3" system and a tune, and he's at 516 BHP at the flywheel...

I'll be running a similar set up apart from 200 cell and a 2.5" system, so I'm not expecting as much... If I get 465 to 475, I'll consider it money well spent;)

Oooooooooh....

I'm going for the 100 cell cats but like you have a small catback.

The tune I've just put on (but have yet to tweak) made a huge difference so if I can get anything like that difference again from headers then YAY!!

Bearing in mind Gibbo made 470 from just the PMAS and tune I don't think 490-500 is unreasonable.

 

[666mac]

My Kooks landed this morning From Steeda will install along with a plethora of other parts great thread Enoch as always.

Sponsored