Sponsored

Which stance looks better???

WeinerDog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
614
Reaction score
174
Location
VA, USA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red GT/PP
I think the stock ride height is almost perfect on the S550's. Maybe .25-.50 on the front. I'm not bothering with that.
 

Khyber

it's a hard parked life
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Threads
141
Messages
7,617
Reaction score
3,580
Location
Lexington/Myrtle Beach, SC
First Name
Landon
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP CO
I think the stock ride height is almost perfect on the S550's. Maybe .25-.50 on the front. I'm not bothering with that.
it's not height it's wheel gap difference that looks better over stock
 

WeinerDog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
614
Reaction score
174
Location
VA, USA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red GT/PP
it's not height it's wheel gap difference that looks better over stock
I'm pretty sure we're talking about the same thing, but OK. Make that:

I think the wheel gap is almost perfect on the S550's. Maybe .25-.50 on the front. I'm not bothering with that.
 

Khyber

it's a hard parked life
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Threads
141
Messages
7,617
Reaction score
3,580
Location
Lexington/Myrtle Beach, SC
First Name
Landon
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP CO
of course we are but my point was the point isn't to make the car lower to ground it's just to reduce the wheel gap and of course imo while the stock spring's gap is better than s197... still too much space and absolutely looks like a 4x4 with 20s and 305s. lol
 

Sponsored

CEHollier

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2015
Threads
81
Messages
1,572
Reaction score
705
Location
Prairieville, La.
First Name
Charles
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium Magnetic
Vehicle Showcase
1
Does lowering both A or B cause the car bottom to drag with daily driving? Factory height is low enough to require rolling over a small ramp we designed so we can get the floor jack underneath the car. Any lower and it would be even a bigger PITA getting up on stands. Just my couple of cents.
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,722
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
If the front wasn't lowered as much, I'd go with just the front lowered. Hiding the tops of the tires under the sheetmetal - front or rear - detracts from the mostly round shape that tires are supposed to have and makes the car look like it isn't actually meant to be, ummm, driven.


Oh, wait . . .


Norm
 

Khyber

it's a hard parked life
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Threads
141
Messages
7,617
Reaction score
3,580
Location
Lexington/Myrtle Beach, SC
First Name
Landon
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP CO
Does lowering both A or B cause the car bottom to drag with daily driving? Factory height is low enough to require rolling over a small ramp we designed so we can get the floor jack underneath the car. Any lower and it would be even a bigger PITA getting up on stands. Just my couple of cents.

no whether car is lowered or not still need to take thigns sideways and just need a low profile jack
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

Ultrakla$$ic

Whoflung Poo
Joined
Jul 8, 2015
Threads
51
Messages
1,592
Reaction score
701
Location
Louisiana
First Name
Darren
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Ingot Silver Premium
Pics just washed up, no wax or coating:





aKoP8P8l.jpg


allN08Al.jpg


LOVE THE INGOT!!!!
Sponsored

 
 




Top