SheepDog
Well-Known Member
Just like the article says, a standard bearing clearance for most production engines is fairly standard. Ford cranks out bazillions of these engines, they aren't going to tighten up the clearances year over year. That would require changes to assembly lines, tooling etc. that costs them overhead."Increases to compression come from longer connecting rods, longer stroke on the crankshaft rod bearing journals, larger(thicker) shaped pistons, smaller cylinder head shape, thinner head gasket, or a combination of those."
I understand this.
"A "tight" bearing clearance, with a smaller hydrodynamic wedge between the journals and bearing surfaces has advantages, too. It can provide more even and uniform loads on the bearings, as well as more uniform oil pressure on them. Additionally, less oil is required to maintain the hydrodynamic wedge, which translates into a reduced load on the oil pump that can result in more horsepower."
This is what I meant when I said "tolerances". And I stand behind the statement that tighter tolerances can lead to a change in viscosity requirements. At least to get to ideal lubricating conditions.
I'm not arguing, I'm clarifying
People use the term "Clearance" to refer to bearing, journal, crankshaft, camshaft etc. clearance between rotating parts. Not "Clearance" between the top of a piston and the cylinder head.
Sponsored