EcoVert
Well-Known Member
Wasn't the 2.0T Camaro the car that General Motor Trend swapped the tires on to make it more competitive with the EB Mustang?
Yes it was and 93 octane in the camaro and 87 octane in the Mustang
Sponsored
Wasn't the 2.0T Camaro the car that General Motor Trend swapped the tires on to make it more competitive with the EB Mustang?
I don't get the question. The Mustang would win that comparison IMO. Maybe all the Chevy guys in the vs. section would be irritated, but not the Ford people.Where has there been a comparison with a non PP Mustang? Could you imagine the up roar on this site if you saw a shootout between a base GT going up against a 1SS?
You think a base GT would win against a 1ss in a comparison shootout.:lol:I don't get the question. The Mustang would win that comparison IMO. Maybe all the Chevy guys in the vs. section would be irritated, but not the Ford people.
I don't know about magazine racing. Which is what the Chevy guys are all about. But Your guys fast list completely sucks compared to ours!You think a base GT would win against a 1ss in a comparison shootout.:lol:
Not for stock.I don't know about magazine racing. Which is what the Chevy guys are all about. But Your guys fast list completely sucks compared to ours!
I'm not stock.;)Not for stock.
Easily. Only the performance of the SS is better - and it's only slightly better. The win in all other categories goes to the GT. The GT performance is plenty good enough for most people. If you want more performance the Coyote is a better engine for FI as well. Just the difference in MSRP is enough to convince most people to buy the GT, without the other issues the Camaro has.You think a base GT would win against a 1ss in a comparison shootout.:lol:
I'm more interested in how they'll find a way for the 18 Mustang to lose a comparo. It'll match the Camaro's performance and it's already the better all around car today. People aren't running out and buying the 4 seat Corvette for a reason.Notice how General Motor Trend won't compare Mustang with any of the dealer installed, warrantied, and 50 state legal performance packs to the Camaro? Almost all of them cost less than the tires they put on the Camaro but have never done on any other car.
Probably because a GT would smoke the SS and the EB, in it's factory detuned state already beat the V6 Camaro, would murder it and the 2.0 regardless of what tires were on it.
Gm would probably then pull most if not all of the 10 full page advertisements killing the profitabilty of the magazine
Is there any major magazine with a Frod bias?I'm more interested in how they'll find a way for the 18 Mustang to lose a comparo. It'll match the Camaro's performance and it's already the better all around car today. People aren't running out and buying the 4 seat Corvette for a reason.
I'm more interested in how they'll find a way for the 18 Mustang to lose a comparo. It'll match the Camaro's performance and it's already the better all around car today. People aren't running out and buying the 4 seat Corvette for a reason.
Dredging this back up. Lizardrko, I've actually owned two of each:Sorry, I was talking about the Camaro 2.0T, not the SS. I want the Ecoboost vs 2.0T comparison lol. But yeah the SS is a beast
Would you even need to disclose a tune? FRPP or Cobb stage 1 transform the car completely and I can't think of a way they could tell.If you put a tune on the Mustang, does it bump it up a class? It's a completely different car with a tune.
Yep, a tune would bump you into a higher class.Would you even need to disclose a tune? FRPP or Cobb stage 1 transform the car completely and I can't think of a way they could tell.