2015 Mustang V6 BAMA 93 Octane Performance V2 Tune

[zackmd1]

well, hows the sounds compare?

It actually is pretty comparable! The idle is a-little quieter then the LTs (due to the high flow vs OEM cats) but retains the same deep note! Once I get above 3k is were the sound really starts to change inside. I get a more defined exhaust note and overall the sound is just more "refined" then the LTs.

Sponsored

 

[fordguys550]

WOOOT^^^ change in power?

 

[zackmd1]

WOOOT^^^ change in power?

Can't really comment on that tell I get the new tune.... The difference between the stock tune and the BAMA is pretty significant currently.

 

[zackmd1]

Got my tune! Initial impressions.....

Holy S**t this thing has was more low end then I was expecting! I can now burn through tires from a dead stop well into 2nd gear! Something that the LTs only managed for about 75% of first. All that low end power though doesn't do much for top end. I did loose power up top but it doesn't feel drastic by any means. Also a thing to note here is that this is a 91 tune instead of 93, I just flashed the tune, and it is the first revision. If history repeats itself then when I complete the datalogging process and get a rev 2 tune I should gain some more top end.

 

[fordguys550]

Thats good news. Alot of guys talk crap about the shorties, but they help our motors where they need it the most

 

[zackmd1]

Headers are up for sale!

http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1274273#post1274273

 

[professorwoof]

Do I need a new tune if I am going from stock headers to shorty?

 

[zackmd1]

Do I need a new tune if I am going from stock headers to shorty?

No you do not.

 

[fordguys550]

you don't per say, but I didn't notice any gains with mine until the tune was adjusted for it. could have just been the tune I was running though

 

[BamaSupport]

Typically shorty headers do not require a tune, but these cars really benefit from exhaust mods. We suggest setting up a datalog with us

Sponsored