Sponsored

Mishimoto Induction Tube

Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Threads
21
Messages
1,078
Reaction score
395
Location
GA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
What logs? This is all I have from them. It was a Time Attack classification dyno run so it was just hook up (DynaPak with no tail pipe sniffer, just OBD hook up) run, swap intake tube, run and then unhook. I can ask the dyno operator for any other info. The print out is I have on hand.
So how did you know the timing was reduced?
Sponsored

 
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Threads
21
Messages
1,078
Reaction score
395
Location
GA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Question to anyone with this hose...does your on board computer read A/F weird after install? It seems to bounce around a lot and at WOT, won't go down for a bit.

That said, I didn't unhook the battery yet (maybe resets ECU?)
Nope. I've posted my logs in a thread I made not too long ago comparing Mishimito to JLT to stock.
 
OP
OP
wmfateam

wmfateam

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
318
Reaction score
142
Location
Arizona
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Whitey
Vehicle(s)
2017 LB GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
So how did you know the timing was reduced?
I am going off what the dyno operator said. The car was having issues as soon as he was getting into the throttle for the run. He managed to get the ECU to not have load issues earlier in the 3rd and forth runs, as seen in the graph where it looks like there is a huge gain. That is why he told me that at 4k the graphs come back to actual data that is not being affected by the ECU removing timing, again what I remember him saying which could be incorrect, but I do remember 100% that at 4k and up all the runs are on par. This was not a tuning session so I did not expect anything further than numbers and a graph. I emailed the Dyno Operator to get some clarification.
 
OP
OP
wmfateam

wmfateam

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
318
Reaction score
142
Location
Arizona
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Whitey
Vehicle(s)
2017 LB GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
The heavy load and steady RPM at the beginning of the pull is what he said caused the data to be off up until 4k. There was no saved data or logging. That is just from what he knows and his experience.
 

HoosierDaddy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Threads
263
Messages
4,576
Reaction score
8,973
Location
Winchestertonfieldville (ok, Scottsdale), AZ
First Name
Randy
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium PP, 2023 Tesla Model 3 Performance, 1978 Trans Am WS6, etc.
The heavy load and steady RPM at the beginning of the pull is what he said caused the data to be off up until 4k. There was no saved data or logging. That is just from what he knows and his experience.
I'm no dyno expert. So I can't tell from your posts if the problem below 4k was from the dyno or operator not doing what's optimal to get numbers below 4k or from some problem with the tube? A mod that causes problems with a load below 4k would not be good.
 

Sponsored

texasboy21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Threads
14
Messages
482
Reaction score
159
Location
Houston
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT PP. 2005.5 Audi A4, 1983 Silverado
Guy I got my Mishimoto tube from did back-to-backs with Airaid full CAI and this with stock box and K&N filter. Picked up max of 30 whp with the Mishi tube and stock box over the Airaid, and I recall about 15 at peak power. [MENTION=31127]ALUSA[/MENTION] you have the dyno sheets?

[MENTION=13955]ryant601[/MENTION], mine bounced a little bit on the first start-up after installing. Since then, no. It's been very smooth.
How/why would the Mishimoto tube have such large gains over the Airaid tube?
 
OP
OP
wmfateam

wmfateam

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
318
Reaction score
142
Location
Arizona
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Whitey
Vehicle(s)
2017 LB GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
I'm no dyno expert. So I can't tell from your posts if the problem below 4k was from the dyno or operator not doing what's optimal to get numbers below 4k or from some problem with the tube? A mod that causes problems with a load below 4k would not be good.
The runs after the tube was installed are actually better ( less load issue ) compared to the stock. As it was just for TA classification, was not something he tried to overcome as he knew what was going on and we were just looking at max power. It was just a basic $60 three pulls run that he let me do four runs and swap a part midway so I was happy. I wasn't looking to post damning data or a smoking gun to buy this part, just trying to get as much data out as possible as I have not seen a bone stock no tune back to back with this tube. I will be going back after I install my PP1 as well.
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
I'm no dyno expert. So I can't tell from your posts if the problem below 4k was from the dyno or operator not doing what's optimal to get numbers below 4k or from some problem with the tube? A mod that causes problems with a load below 4k would not be good.
Not a real problem. My car feels quite a bit stronger between 3k-6k with the tube.
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
How/why would the Mishimoto tube have such large gains over the Airaid tube?
The Airaid tube has less volume between MAF and throttle body compared to stock and the Mishimoto tube. If you read Mishimoto's development thread on this part, they found that they lost power when they did a nearly constant cross-section tube compared to stock, and saw gains after adding the buldge, which replaces the resonator chamber. That chamber deals with the wave harmonics in the intake system, like the when the air hits a closed intake valve that it was heading towards and bounces back.
 

ryant601

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Threads
88
Messages
994
Reaction score
162
Location
NJ
First Name
Ryan
Vehicle(s)
'16 GT - Black Accent Package
I'll try and watch/video mine to see if that happens. But I don't have anything to compare it to since I have not looked at that while driving. I might put the stock tube back on to get a direct compare. Do by chance know what it does with the stock tube connected?
I don't, but I feel like I'd notice it and I don't recall seeing it with the stock tube.
 

Sponsored

Mustang_Lou

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 1, 2016
Threads
13
Messages
1,843
Reaction score
822
Location
Toronto, Canada
Vehicle(s)
2020 Mustang Bullitt
Guy I got my Mishimoto tube from did back-to-backs with Airaid full CAI and this with stock box and K&N filter. Picked up max of 30 whp with the Mishi tube and stock box over the Airaid, and I recall about 15 at peak power.
Really? It'd be interesting to see what the gains are after the fuel trims have settled. I wonder if these gains shown by the guy you bought the Mishi from and the OP are related to that?

In other words, comparing an Airaid that's been on the car for many miles and then swapping to a Mishi right on the dyno is not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Same if it was the other way around (guy with a Mishi on for many miles swapping to an Airaid on the dyno).

Ideally, I'd suggest another Mishi dyno after a few hundred miles and a handful of starts but I know dyno's cost $.
 

buymycar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2016
Threads
61
Messages
322
Reaction score
39
Location
the desert
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT base. Roush axleback and frpp xpipe.
excuse my ignorance, but how does a simple tube swap produce that much extra power on a stock tune?

Same question with a CAI? Can it really be pushing that much extra air into the engine?

edit: a few extra HP/torque is expected, but over 6 seems strange to me.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
wmfateam

wmfateam

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
318
Reaction score
142
Location
Arizona
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Whitey
Vehicle(s)
2017 LB GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1

Mustang_Lou

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 1, 2016
Threads
13
Messages
1,843
Reaction score
822
Location
Toronto, Canada
Vehicle(s)
2020 Mustang Bullitt
excuse my ignorance, but how does a simple tube swap produce that much extra power on a stock tune?

Same question with a CAI? Can it really be pushing that much extra air into the engine?

edit: a few extra HP/torque is expected, but over 6 seems strange to me.
As much as I'd love to believe it, I think it too sounds optimistic but I've expressed my thoughts on possibly why a few posts up.
 
OP
OP
wmfateam

wmfateam

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
318
Reaction score
142
Location
Arizona
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Whitey
Vehicle(s)
2017 LB GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
As much as I'd love to believe it, I think it too sounds optimistic but I've expressed my thoughts on possibly why a few posts up.
I understand and agree with you. I will be doing the Ford Power Pack 1 and going back to the dyno again. I know that will be a dyno with the PP1 already installed as I want to put miles on it before I dyno. There is a local guy doing the Airaid tube, I might try and get him to throw my Mishi on to see if he gets different results.
Sponsored

 
 








Top