The 2015 Ward's 10 best engines list has the LT1. No coyote. No voodoo.
http://m.wardsauto.com/diesel/variety-distinguishes-2015-ward-s-10-best-engines
Every time I check in here, more and more people are catching on to the pill's lunacy. It never ends! I guess someone has to be the village (forum?) idiot.
With every post, he loses more respect... as if he ever had any to begin with. lol!
pill, every SCCA comment you make seems to be wrong...
As others have pointed out, that's comparing the brand spanking new (& improved?) 6th Gen Mustang platform to the old, tired, fat 5th Gen platform. If it's just barely edging the OLD one, what will it do in comparison to the new one that is hundreds of pounds lighter with more horsepower?
That same company plans on making brake kits for the S550 soon as well, since it has A LOT of room for improvement, per their initial post...
http://www.essexpartsblog.com/news/s550-mustang-arrives
So you found a blog post analyzing the C7 brakes from a company that sells C7 brake kits and the verdict is...wait for it... you should upgrade to our brake kits!
MIND. BLOWN.
Here are a few tidbits from that blog post...
So according to their findings, the new brakes on the C7 are better...
Point taken. I revise my challenge to thepill - the 2016 Camaro SS will out-brake the 2016 Mustang GT.
I would counter that both are important factors for braking. The ability for the brakes chosen to stop a vehicle in the shortest distance possible would be the most important factor for a...
LOL, ok that is mincing words... and backpedaling. So it now sounds like, after all your complaints, you are saying that you wouldn't be surprised if the Camaro beats the mustang in braking during comparison reviews?
Except that, if driven long enough, the mustang would eventually prevail...
So now that you've stopped lurking (or more accurately, scouring the internet for more "inside info"), what's your answer?
No need to mince words, or obscure your opinion behind your crystal ball - Are you willing to put your reputation on the line and claim that the 2015 Mustang GT brakes will...
Why would you laugh? Can you not read?
Car & Driver: (70-0mph)
New Mustang: 149ft
Old Camaro: 145ft <-- winner
Motor Trend: (60-0mph)
New Mustang: 107ft
Old Camaro: 99ft <-- Winner
Edmunds: (60-0mph)
New Mustang: 108ft
Old Camaro: 107ft <-- Winner
You keep getting stuck on some random rotor...
Todd, it actually sounds like you may be the one who is 100% discredited by your own members. And again, remember that we are talking about the brand new, "much improved" Mustang losing to the old, tired, "fat" Camaro. What happens in a few months when that Camaro gains 55hp, 40ft lbs of...
Ford put all the engineering prowess they had into the new Mustang, but focused mainly on IRS and a polarizing new look. Unfortunately, it was only able to get it close to the performance of the outgoing Camaro, as shown, over and over again, in lots of head to heads, such as...
[ame]
You ask...
BMW (and Merc) is well ahead of Ford in JD powers most recent study. Ford is very near the bottom
http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2015-vehicle-dependability-study
Yup, you're FULL of insider info. Just days before the reveal you're reporting 440HP and still sticking with that 3850-3900lb "prediction". You still stand by that or are you shamed enough to move that target down now for a base SS? Because I'm happy to wait it out until the official number are...
I like all three "modern muscle" cars on the market right now, but happen to like the Camaro the most. That doesn't mean I don't enjoy reading up on the mustang and Challanger as well. I don't post much because I don't own a mustang and therefore don't generally have much factual information to...
...and on cue, you two missed the point.
Isn't this thread titled "2016 Chevy Camaro will outperform Ford Mustang in every way"? Any rational forum user would assume that makes Camaro facts appropriate here. The article that the title references clearly shows that the 2016 Camaro SS was driven...
This happens over and over and over here and gets completely overlooked and ignored by thepill apologists, so I'm going top point it out for you guys...
Just one of dozens of examples of thePill being completely wrong, being proven by another member to be completely wrong -with actual facts-...
Weird, Mustang guys have spent the last decade defending the SRA, stating how it improves 60ft, 0-60 and quarter mile times. Now all of a sudden, the move to IRS, we have quotes all over like "With the improved weight distribution and IRS, the GT (automatic and manual) is going to have 60-foot...