If the direction was more power and weight or less power and weight, what would you prefer?
Current: 460hp - 3,800lbs
Option 1: 500hp - 4,000lbs
Option 2: 440hp - 3,500lbs
:cheers:
To add to that:
It looks like GM beat the Ford GT's (pro in a T-shirt) time at VIR in a pre-production ZR-1 with racing seats, harness bar, harness, etc... with their in-house pro-"engineer" in a racing suit.
The suit has to be worth 0.5 seconds.
If you say 4,100lbs is fixed then of course you want the most HP possible if that's the only variable.
HP tends to come at the penalty of weight. Reducing weight costs money. That's why Hellcats are so powerful and heavy because they trade off low cost and high power over lighter weight...
What lap time do you care about?
-Amateur journalists because they best represent what is attainable at the track. But it's not the true capability of the car.
-Professionals like Randy Pobst who are usually unbiased, but based on his own comments, does not get much time in the car to learn...
Apparently so. Although there seems to be more people talking about and guessing the GT500's power than its weight.
HP seems to still be the main selling point, rather than a car's weight. Unless you're Mazda who markets the grams saved everywhere on the MX5.
What's more important and better for performance?
For comparison:
Hellcat: 4,450lbs - 707hp = 6.29lbs/hp
ZL1: 3,900lbs - 650hp = 6lbs/hp
Demon: 4,250lbs - 808hp = 5.26lbs/hp
Z06: 3,524lbs - 650hp = 5.42lbs/hp
Of course having less weight and more power would be the ideal goal, but using a...
Thank you all for your comments. It's surprising to see (currently) a 80/20 split in favor of vents, especially when you consider how many aftermarket bolt-on scoops that are sold.