Search results

Correct. The product is implied to fit and function correctly for the car it’s advertised to fit. If it does not and the manufacturer will not make it right, that’s literally a major reason for the chargeback to exist. I’ve had to do it and it absolutely can be a course of action that works.

Credit card chargeback was made for situations like this. If the product does not meet reasonable expectations for use, then the manufacturer has to make it right. If not, you get your money back.

I just dig up the instructions and they don’t call the fittings out specifically. Looks like it shipped with those parts installed from Corsa (like your picture confirms). Sorry I don’t have a better answer.

Damn, great buy for someone. GLWS

I don’t know off hand but believe I still have the original documentation for that CAI from when I installed it, so I’ll take a look for that when I get back home.

Since I’m working from home today, I ran out to the garage and popped the hood on our Mustang and grabbed some pics for you. Both hoses are OEM if memory serves and Corsa provides the fittings to click them on. It’s been very secure, we’ve had the intake on pretty much since buying the car new...

Be careful. A thicker head gasket can push your quench distance into undesirable territory, making your car *more* detonation prone… the opposite of what you’re trying to do.

This. Compression closer to 10:1 would help a lot if you’re stuck with 93.

“Looks like shit” might have been a bit of a stretch… 😂

Yes as Ruiner says below. Would need a way for the ECU to output a PWM signal though… Smoothboost works great on a centrifugal too FYI… ;) Agreed, Smoothboost would let a centrifugal run “race” pulleys even in street use. Yep :)

Trade that back in for a Quadrifoglio. You’re welcome lol :)

5.2 or Darton-sleeved 5.0 would both work.

Got her out of the garage for the first time this spring and first wash here at the new home in NH. 👍

I’ve been running Smoothboost on my 1066 WHP Camaro for about 4 years now. I’ll never own another pd blower without a Smoothboost. Being able to run the same pulley combo whether street or strip is worth it alone.

I haven’t seen that so feel free to post a link. Curious that you feel that necking down the CAI doesn’t contribute to lower power rating…

I definitely understand (my Camaro is 1066 WHP so I’m not a stranger to getting air into motors lol). But removing restrictions on an NA motor is typically a good thing, the 22/23 engines were rated at less HP and the necked down intake was part of that reason. That was my point. :)

So the same, but measures differently lol…?

Check this thread out. Actual MAF tube ID was measured by a fellow forum member. https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/22-23-vs-18-21-cai-measurements.191281/

I don’t think that’s true since the ‘22-‘23 MAF tube is necked down a good bit. The CAI fixes that. Plus OEM has a much smaller filter vs a good brand CAI. I would bet a beer (or several lol) on that test if someone did a back to back on the same dyno.

Agreed. And FWIW I did a Corsa CF CAI on our ‘22 and no tune was needed at all. So it eliminates the carbon trap BS and lets you pick up a few more HP (while looking damn good lol).