So glad they finally gave us a nice blue without purple tint in it. In the sunlight is when you really see how pure blue it looks. In overcast weather the DIB always looks more purple than blue
Is anyone manufacturing these or is it just OEM parts being swapped from Europe to USA and vice versa so far? I was thinking clear might look better on the new grabber blue color rather than red. IMO red and blue don't match at all.
There is something weird going on then. This is what nickel looks like. Black is the other option. But there's no grey which is what his post looked like. Perhaps they are just filthy.
Even if they were dirty AND the picture was underexposed I still wouldn't believe this is the same...
From what I found, my A plan discount only saves $4,000 off sticker or so, getting a dealer any lower than that would take some kind of desperate fire sale of old model years.
$1000 IS crazy. I've been detailing since before these "forever lasting" products first started coming out. You can get these exact same results with normal claybar, machine polish, and sealant wax processes. Sure you will have to do it every two years or so, but the products won't cost you...
This is probably as close to the liquid blue from the detroit auto show that we will ever get on a production car, and I'm pretty happy with it.
I'd love to see this with chrome, aluminum or gunmetal wheels.
I may have spotted the same car, grabber blue GT350 with white stripes anyway. brightness is off because its a cell phone at 7 AM. Was driving in a convoy with a lincoln continental and a few other stangs.
What is supposed to be different on the interceptor version?
This vid of the first MRT Catback is my favorite so far... so deep and rumbly compared to everything else.
[ame]
There's a resounding problem with confirmation bias online where people have to constantly reaffirm themselves that the purchase decision they made is the best one possible, and so as a result they have to put down all other possible choices. It's not just here but you'll come across it reading...
Why does Ford do so.. average on torque numbers? GM has been crushing them for decades now with the LSx motors. Not trolling, just curious. The base camaro v8 will have more torque than this motor, not that I think the LS3 will be a better engine, it's just an interesting trend.
Thanks for all the contributions. It is sad news that the big american V8's are now lagging behind these cars. For a really long period of time we were always ahead of them in straight line acceleration and they always were like "yeah but handling is more important" and we just laughed. Now...
the BMW M4 has 425hp/406tq, which is nearly the same as the mustang. It weighs 200 pounds less which is substantial, but here's the kicker. It runs a 12.0-12.2 @ 117+mph. Almost every mustang GT review I've ever seen has managed a 12.8-13.0 from the mustang. Where is that .6-.8 seconds...
Here are some hard numbers.
http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/2015/long-term-road-test/2015-ford-mustang-gt-performance-package-worth-the-money.html
If that is accurate then the braking difference is quite substantial. Has anyone priced out what it would cost to buy the PP brakes and put them...