What are your thoughts on this if I'm considering going E85?
http://www.fordnxt.com/tech-stories/fuel-cooling-ignition-tech/high-pressure-pump-unlocks-direct-injection-gains/
Very true but in my case there was numerous Whipple 3.4 making big numbers running slower times and numerous KB 2.6/2.8 making lower dyno numbers and running quicker times.
I probably need to get out of the mode of comparing my Lightning to this Mustang's. But what I meant is when the 3.4 Whipple came out for the Lightning's I got one (the latest and greatest) I could make huge dyno numbers all day long but when it came to track times the 2.6 and 2.8 KB were for...
Yea I figured they probably would put the cheapest octane in there. I wasn't shooting to have hero numbers, I just needed a baseline. I knew it wouldn't be able to pull to 74-7500. Even bigger I have mods that I'm itching to get on.
They are on the low side but I just wanted a starting point. I don't know if these two factors would make a difference but the was still the original tank of gas the dealership put in the car so with a that said I don't know what octane gas was in there (I'm thinking 89 at the highest). After he...
I don't want to be a bubble buster but when my COTUS said "0" it was still in the awaiting shipment phase. I was told by the dealer that it's in a "factory hold" and sometimes it for minor reasons and sometimes it's for other reasons. But saying all that they said the car could show up tomorrow...
I really want to stay with the stock equipment. My car will be more track oriented but I just want a little more "BUMP" so I'm not trying to get to involved on the audio side.