Search results

Well yea. When he posts blatantly false info it generally gets on people's nerves. He's definitely posted relevant correct info before, that's fine. I've even agreed with him on some points. But when he goes way out in left field it just confuses me...

And going on some of the logic I've seen on this thread... http://www.torquenews.com/106/2016-ford-mustang-gt-convertible-gets-performance-package Why does the PP GT convertible need extra bracing? (Strut tower brace, k brace). Not to mention *GASP* A LARGER RADIATOR!!! It's obviously because...

I've tried. It just turns into "You make points that I don't understand, so I'm going to ignore it, say Ford 5 times and put a :lol: at the end. Therefore I win the argument." Why talk technical when you can just say what you think and it's magically true? Just like when he said there were a...

NTHSA rated it five stars. But doesn't test small front impact. IIHS does. http://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/desktopnews/flexing-muscle-sports-car-ratings-show-range-of-performance Either way, if you have a small overlap or a rollover, it's going to hurt.

Yea. Trust the guy who has no knowledge of Engineering or FEA analysis. That's f'ing rich. LMAO

How dare they put a better performance tire on a car specked out to be on the track more than the one with a slightly less performance tire meant more for daily cruising and occasional track use... Also, how dare they use coolers to cool an engine and other parts of the drive train. It should...

I think he meant 4 seat corvette. However the ATS-V is a fun car. Just saying...

Awww.... Look at you. Trying to to play engineer and argue with a real one. So cute. ;) While GM has been known to overstate things in the past, I'm going to go with Chevy's numbers from actual engineers showing the 6th gen Camaro's frame is 28% stiffer than the previous gen car over some...

Oh man... I loved both of the 2012's I owned. I sold the second one to buy a house and was planning on getting another one once I was all settled in. And then the refresh happened... I was happy that there was a refresh coming. And then the reveal came, and they rotated the car around to the...

And you'd also think in 2017 people wouldn't put ketchup on a steak. Yet here we are... :) I have a feeling they're going to revamp the front and rear entirely for the refresh... Kinda like how the Charger changed dramatically up front in 2015. I personally don't mind the looks though, but I'm...

Once again. The Camaro is perfectly fine rigidity wise and handles just fine. If you think just throwing more metal at something makes it better, you have no idea how engineering works. But since you seem to think using light weight metals and materials makes a car inferior, you must think...

1. Just curious. What do you think their testing out there then still? That's a serious question. The only thing I can figure is a refresh. Something that is probably needed sooner than later. 2. I don't necessarily see this as a bad thing. 3. Not currently in production though for Ford. At...

Meh. I've always preferred OHV V8 engines compared to DOHC. I'd prefer they didn't, but that's probably up there with people who would prefer a solid rear axle. lol. It's going to eventually change to something better. I've just always enjoyed the low end torque that the LS/LT motors offer...

Well... Yea. I doubt anyone will have that. If they did somehow though... Holy shit. :thumbsup:

I tried reading all of this but got stuck on this part in particular... I'm just trying to envision a bag of smashed assholes and form it into the shape of a Mustang. I've heard all sorts of comparisons to what cars can look like. But this is on a whole 'nother level. I think a lot of people...

Looks are subjective. With this train of thought, all vehicles are short-lived and you shouldn't buy any of them. Why buy the S650 when a couple of years later there will be a refresh, and then a S750 in 2026. Buy what you want/can afford. I personally think the new upgrades in the refresh...

You got me there... Not sure why I was thinking Al said it. I also adjusted the times... I was an entire second off on both their time and mine. lol Thanks daylight savings time... I can still blame that right?

I don't disagree with you. However it seems like a lot of people here (myself included in the past) are more worried about magazine numbers than real world performance. Even if the Z/28 or ZL1 was bumped up to make Chevy look good, they are/were one hell of a car when they came out. I'm pretty...

So did I. That's why I referenced it. lol [ame=""]

Exactly... Can talk about which car beat who in a magazine but 98% of the people on this forum (myself included) couldn't even get close to the times the cars put down. And when some couldn't match that time, they'd go complain on this forum that the car isn't doing what the magazine said it...