Search results

Big number but it certainly could have something to do with being broken in little more than some of the cars we saw a couple months back also I understand fuel quality can be somewhat iffy up North in the Winter time nd some people may not have had full access to 93 octane. Did it have any...

A dumpster is pretty light too when empty.....I just never want to drive one.

You honestly think the Tank will ever be as desirable or hold value like the Shelby.....bawawawawaw

Might be hard to confirm because no one really buys them but I doubt they roll out of the dealer with the degree of camber that the car in the video had.....meanwhile just bald tires and missing aero on the GT500....

Good point but you're missing the real point which why is the GM product always "adjusted" yet we have no proof that the GT500 is set on kill???

Yet the only proof we have of ANY of these comparisons show that the GM is always modded or they bring in a different car to run a different test? Why? And even Randy said the GT500 was UNDENIABLY THE FASTER TRACK car on good tires(MORE THAN 10mph faster on the straights).....you people are like...

he never mentioned any camber adjustment just aero setting.....stop making stuff up.

The cambered Camaro is not the won that ran. Yes it is ….

QUOTE="Classic Lover, post: 2803923, member: 47019"]Maybe so, however the gt500 has been run with track setting adjustments done. Maybe I missed it.....all CD said is they adjusted the wing and installed the SW's….Throttle House did not even have the front aero and they damned sure didn't do...

If missing half it's aero and the other half set wrong then whatever....I guess that was to compensate for the flat tires it came in on.....

but, but, but it had 125 more HP......sound familiar?

Also on a prepped surface or with even stickier tires.....AND it's faster on any but the shorter(autocross) road courses.....it's more versatile, faster, rides better and is a helluva lot better looking...it's really a no contest.

If you flip it over there's a flyer for huge discounts on discontinued stock….

Yeah...that's worked out real well....Those guys will be knocking on Fords door for a job since they killed the Camaro...

There has never been any mention of any track adjustments other than aero on the GT500 anywhere in any test yet we can visually see all sorts of camber on the Camaro... The rest of everything else is opinion or too close that it couldn't be one way or the other depending on driver...

Amazing how when someone who actually likes Mustangs drive the times are almost always better.....

Another biased opinion piece by the bought and paid for car media....I'm sure they'll adjust the track times accordingly.....My guess is the splitter wickers were removed after the first timed hot lap and left off until the tires were "seasoned" on the GT500 for an "official time":cwl:

The base GT500 is not adjustable if I'm not mistaken....so they should have compared the C8Z51 to a CFTP.....right?

Simple then....post the times without the adjustment, right?

I think a low mileage ZO6 will be a great performance grab and if availability and adm. on the GT500 stay as they are I could be pretty happy toolin' around in one for a couple of years...As much as I love Ford I'm also a bit like Randy....old and cheap..