Sure, but why does it have to be given a name that dilutes an existing brand/trim? Just call it something else.
The Bronco Sport is likely a decent enough daily driver, but why associate it with this?
The Mach E is likely a decent enough "sporty" EV, but why associate it with this?
Etc...
Fun part of my viper, I don't have to "try" to light up the rear, it will easily spin by just throttle application alone in any gear up to 3rd, nothing else required but my right foot :)
Bad part of my viper, tires are $$$$ in that fitment (like $600 USD for each rear) so it's also an expensive...
Why does ford overwhelmingly feel the need to dilute their catalogue of historical names? Did anyone tell them it's okay to come up with something new?
Bronco Sport 🤢
Mach E 🤮
Mach 4 💩
Try owning a superbike. When I had my R1, I had every idiot with a civic with a fart pipe wanting to "race" me.
Hate to break it to you kid, my bike has a power to weight ratio that equalled supercars at the time, unless you put about 3x the price of your car into the engine, don't bother...
Whoops. FIxed (I think)
No that was just me not being OCD enough, likely tweaked it a bit when I was putting all the assemblies together.
It does actually have adjustable aero (likely not very noticeable from pics) and active suspension adjustment based on steering input :P
I need to do something like that for my garage, the concrete is so slippery when it's wet (particularly if I have snow on my boots)
Is that just a pour-on resin?
Semi-contrasting opinion... I've just got a plain jane GT and it was easily the best car I'd ever owned (and likely still is, objectively), until I bought one of my dream cars (viper). That car moved the yard stick for enjoyment so far beyond anything I had experienced that I can barely...