the reason i said that is because they might have been conservative with the numbers,it might have had 25hp more or less give or take.the GT500 had more than it was rated at.
well pill,i have heard from many that it is a design flaw.i dont know if it is or is not.what is known is the car cant be ran for long periods of time,without some kind of issue.
alot of the motors blowing up with the z06 and stingray were not even being tested on the track.remember the blown motor with 6 miles on it?i think there were a couple that had less than 900 miles on it.i think the problem is the motor itself.:lol:
true,and like i have said before motor trend/chevy trend got a 12.3 out of a BOSS 302.there is no reason the GT350 should not be at 11.8,and the R at 11.6.:ford:
well,the vette is junk.Garbage Motors just throws things together and this is another example of why they are a Gigantic Mistake.:lol:
:lol::lol::lol::cheers:
motor trend got a BOSS 302,0-60 in 4 flat,and the 1/4mile was [email protected] that was with 444hp.the GT350 will be 0-60 under 4 seconds maybe 3.8,and a 1/4mile of 11.8 maybe.the R should be quicker.:ford:
:ford:again the money that was spent on the flat plane crank motor,tells me it will be used somewhere else besides the GT350.just my thoughts.didnt FORD trademark ecobeast?that says something.