Search results

I'll add my speculation on the S550 code, which I doubt is right, but ya never know... S = carry over from the last couple models for Sports 5 = to represent the 5 of T-5 (Mustang I) 50 = 50th anniversary

Snow tires work wonders. Here's a 2013 in the snow. [ame]

I'm not getting one in black, as I've sworn off ever owning a black car again, but damn black looks good in that pic.

Maybe they're saying it because it's an emissions thing for that setting.

Just for the sake of discussion... Assuming torque remained the same at 8000rpm as the respective peak power RPMs listed above, you'd have the following: Ferrari example at 8000rpm: 500hp Hyundai example at 8000rpm: 536hp

It would be awesome if Ford could get near the steering feel of the E36 M3. To me, that was perfect.

Fully agree... A passenger car is not going to overload a well constructed wheel to get it to deflect by any reasonable measure. A lot of other crap is going to fail long before its a wheel issue. Reminds me of Sebastien Buemi's crash due to suspension failure. Watch as the wheels fly off...

I think this is the latest on the weight discussion from Ford, which was back on January 14th. http://www.autoevolution.com/news/2015-mustang-chief-engineer-interview-can-t-wait-for-people-to-drive-it-74692.html

Yeah, they could have stretched the budget another $2 made the engine cover on that EB look a little better.

I'll add my logic... Looking back at every power increase from the 4th generation through today, the average increase was 11%. If you remove the change from the old modular engine to the Coyote, the average is 8%. The smallest increase was 2% (change from 2012 to 2013). So applying those...

I don't see them adding weight to the Mustang. Especially since ultimately their benchmarks for performance are the 911 and M3. My internal speculation odds are like this: 50%, >100lbs loss; 40%, remains within +\-100lbs; 10%, >100lbs gain. Furthermore, aren't they dropping like 700lbs from...

Nice. Can you show us a chart with the data for 2/2013 to 2/2014 with mustang sales minus camaro sales to show the delta in recent sales?

I'm sure there will be some dealer(s) out there that put some ridiculous ADM on it when it comes out. But I agree with your shock they'd be beyond stupid to put the MSRP anywhere near that figure.

2007 Mazdaspeed3 54,000 miles Average: 21 mpg Best: 31 mpg Worst: 17 mpg

In addition to the Mustang GT, I'm considering the S3 or MKVII Golf R and maybe a used C63. However, the C63 repair costs will probably keep me from going that route unless I find a deal I can't pass up.