I don't understand why you replied to any of this to begin with other than to argue. Do you ever log out? How do you immediately reply to every comment I post?
Yeah because you want to argue on the internet with no basis to back up what you're saying. You've yet to explain what significant means to you, other than it's not as significant as whipple. Which clearly by my statement is not what we are comparing
You also have not told me what I said that...
Read my comment. What does it say that isn't specific enough for you?
anybody that wasn't trying to start a pointless argument would agree a 15% gain is pretty significant
Why do people on this website always want to argue? Here is a comparison of the smallest centrifugal supercharger I'm aware of that you can buy....notice the difference basically from 2500 up which is basically foot brake rpm with a stock converter...
It's not really debatable. Just because a whipple makes more torque does not mean a centri makes no torque. There is still a significant increase over stock at low RPM
The ditch you go into is gonna laugh at you if you think you are handling 900hp without drag radials with any type of forced induction unless you are using a timing ramp
Says the guy who thinks wheels change spring rate. Now if you want to argue it changes dynamic alignment or something irrelevant like that sure, but you're not putting it in an alignment table and seeing a difference, that's silly.