Search results

From this R & T article, among many others: http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/news/g6295/2016-chevrolet-camaro-ss-and-rs-exclusive-photos/? I like the car, but what is... is. I'm not sure where you've been looking for photos, but I'd certainly like to think the above R&T article is on...

If the fuel tank isn't full, he's pretty close. :thumbsup:

This was probably already answered, but 4 pages... pass. Indeed, Ford claims that is with a completely full tank of fuel. :cheers: They also said the coolant was full, per the Car & Driver article I read earlier today. Of course, I'd expect full coolant for any car. So it should be about 100...

I like it as much as from the start, but I'm still uncertain on the interior. It looks fine, but the fit & finish are lacking in a big way from the pictures I've seen thus far. I hear constantly that it's much better than Mustang and even Challenger... but the only people saying that are diehard...

I wasn't giving you permission... reminding someone they could begin acting like a thoughtful adult or continue as a thoughtless child isn't actually permission. It's simply making a point. You had permission the entire time. What you chose to do with it is the difference. :thumbsup: This has...

Says the guy who thought the thread was posted today ... :thumbsup: It's not about what I need. He made a thread as he wanted. You whined like a little girl. Move on already. Or... you can just continue :frusty:

Simmahdon-nah! 1st, the thread is well over a month old, not from last weekend. 2nd, while I agree that winning drag races isn't just about stomping the go pedal, his point wasn't about NHRA or any other bona fide racing, but that there are no turns or consistent use of brakes and throttle...

Gotta love that exhaust outlet! Aside from looking like there really aren't 4 pipes(there evidently aren't), it actually reminds me of the ... roughly 83-93 LX 5.0 setup. Oddly... I can only truly remember that from 1986, but I could swear it was on the 83 GT a friend of my got for his...

I'm pretty sure it won't be the same engineers. After all, Carroll was in his 80's when he died and I'd expect any surviving engineers from his day have retired by now. :lol: Like 1320 said, it's just easier than saying the whole name. Maybe they could just say Mustang... :cheers:

CONGRATULATIONS! Overcoming the new disadvantages is worth bragging about. With that, who's expecting another 25-50 lb weight gain to come? After all, the competition was within .3 seconds or so and... how can they beat the Mustang w/o the additional penalty?? :lol: I jest... except I seriously...

Like you(but not Canadian) and thePill, I was injured in the military and it kinda shocks me to see this. Considering your "health care system" as compared to ours(until the past 5 years of idiocy), I'd have thought your injuries would be covered in full, period. Here, we do get that coverage...

I didn't say the decision wasn't easy to make, only that it was premature. Any 3rd grader could've made the realization that slowing down the faster racer(car, bicycle, person, airplane, whatever) could make a race more competitive... That's how out of whack "the powers that be" have it...

I looked up the F150 and Toyota Tundra, etc. on ford.ca and so forth... pricing is way off in comparison to USA. http://bp3.ford.com/2015-Ford-Mustang?branding=1&lang=en&gnav=header-cars#/Models/Style[BodyStyle:BS-BJ] <~ just pick the EB Premium w/ auto and blam... I threw in a random ZIP and...

Not to extend this, though it's fun... I think you're looking at this very differently than most. Pricing in Canada is often very different that USA and this case is no different. Working of MRSP of Mustang EB Premium vs Accord Sedan V6 w/ leather... the Honda has a higher starting price...

A 50 lb addition should cost a little time, but whether or not it could/would be a big deal would really depend on the starting weight. Most here seem to think it's not nice to set the rules, then change the rules after only 1 win... as if that win was some type of crime. For all they know that...

Surely... if the point is to insist upon making sure the favored GM actually has the advantage! :thumbsup: You already know that's wrong, but even so... The V6 Mustang also runs quicker than V6 Accord and then there's the Mustang GT and... 'nuff said??? I priced the Accord V6 in 13 and it was...

I'll give 'em this... WAY EASIER JOB than others are getting used to doing! The point people have been making isn't how close it got so much as, it's simply not true and besides, Cadillac has changed those numbers since the 1st public tests were done, pointing out a car near 3,800 rather than...

Just that you think the Mustang got the Fusion front end is reason enough for me to write you off in terms of Mustang knowledge. How is it that... the 8spd weighs less, but the otherwise identical car weighs more? Clearly, there are other differences. Btw, the Corvette doesn't get a 6spd...

Oh, ok. I think that's a valid view. Of course, they're also heavier, aren't they. I must admit, I haven't "kept up" with racing in some time now, so I wouldn't really know.

:hail: :lol: :doh: All manufacturers omit. In the discussion at hand, GM has changed. There's an immeasurably large difference there. One equals "failed to admit or show" while the other means, "showed, but changed for purposes of gain." One is legal and lacking. The other is probably also...