Sponsored

What are your track/AutoX alignment settings?

Eritas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
935
Reaction score
404
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
So please tell me how to properly use UTQGs to draw any sort of beneficial conclusion about any attribute of the tire.

Sofar the whole thing seems like a joke and pointless. Especially the wear results of the NT01, r888, and PSC2 on stvdsm's GT350.

Do you have proof that the tire mfgs are only allowed to "derate" and not "uprate" the tire? Either way, you admitting that they can and do throws the whole credibility of UTQG out of the window anyway :lol:
Sponsored

 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,722
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
Easy enough to find something here.

Manufacturers are generally very cautious about rating a tire too high and running into problems with NHTSA, so the ratings often reflect, to some extent, the needs of their marketing departments. Marketers typically want to have a range of treadwear ratings that line up with how tires are positioned in the manufacturer’s product offerings. So it is common to rate a tire lower than it could be to make it properly fit within a product line.

Under-rating a tire’s treadwear is common with ultra-high performance and R-compound tires. The manufacturers often aren’t concerned with how these tires wear in actual street use and many consumers (incorrectly) equate low treadwear ratings with high levels of traction. The result is tires with ratings of 40 or 50 that could legitimately be rated much higher.

Norm
 
 




Top