Schwerin
Well-Known Member
Ah so you DONT care about your kid or grand kids lives. Okay.I don’t give a crap about globally warming. I don’t care if the oceans rise a foot by 2100. I will have been dead for 40 years.
Sponsored
Ah so you DONT care about your kid or grand kids lives. Okay.I don’t give a crap about globally warming. I don’t care if the oceans rise a foot by 2100. I will have been dead for 40 years.
If the professor had access to satellite data and the pesky records that those damn scientists keep asking for funding to maintain,, he’d have worked it out fairly quickly.Reminds me of an episode of Gilligan's Island. The "professor" thought the island was sinking because the stick he put in the lagoon was getting further away every day. So the evidence was telling him that either the ocean was rising or the Island was sinking.
Turns out Gilligan was moving the stick every morning.
I'm not sure what hocus pocus news channel you watched but those were never mainstream scientific views.It would be much more believable if they didn't change the historical data. Grab a copy of State of fear and look at the data before it was doctored.
In the 70's we were told an ice age is coming, it didn't happen.
In the 80's and 90's we were told the oceans would rise a foot by 2012. They didn't
Why should we believe them now?
Be careful, I think the moderator isn't of our persuasion or Basic Moral and core beliefs. Just me sayingOk, so yet another thread got shut down, presumably because the moderator felt it was political in nature.
If this is correct, the irony of cancelling something (a discussion around science) because they disagree with it is both hilarious and consistent.
Anyways, things are either demonstrably true or they aren’t.
The sky is blue regardless of your particular persuasions.
The theory of gravity doesn’t have “sides”, nor does the carbon dioxide theory of climatic change. You either grasp it or you don’t.
150 years of science doesn’t care about your political affiliations.
I'm not sure what hocus pocus news channel you watched but those were never mainstream scientific views.
Hey man, I’m LOL’ing with you, lol. The average aerosolized droplet from a sneeze is <0.6 microns and the droplets from a cough (significantly less volatile than a sneeze) is 0.6-16 microns. I’m relating applied science bro, not craziness so go beat up a biochem book if it gets to you.Wow, Mr. Wizard! Now can you tell us how the 0.3 micron filtration of an N95/N100 IS sufficient to capture the particles expelled by the human respiratory system that actually carry viruses? Particles that are 0.5 microns on the small end of the spectrum?
But, in 2017, Comrade Fauci insisted that a viral pandemic would arise in 2020, did he not?It would be much more believable if they didn't change the historical data. Grab a copy of State of fear and look at the data before it was doctored.
In the 70's we were told an ice age is coming, it didn't happen.
In the 80's and 90's we were told the oceans would rise a foot by 2012. They didn't
Why should we believe them now?
It's due to people contracting and recovering from Covid along with the vaccines.that’s not due to masks man.
So you are saying it wasn't the Chinese?Comrade Fauci
The autoantibodies I can agree to. There’s no solid science on the mRNA-based anti-Covid vectors (commonly referred to as vaccines but they’re not).It's due to people contracting and recovering from Covid along with the vaccines.
Ok haven’t said anything about a nationality or an ethnic group. What’s your real question?So you are saying it wasn't the Chinese?