Trackaholic
Well-Known Member
BMW's have always been expensive, but in the past they made visceral driver's cars with engines that sounded good, had excellent throttle response, couple with power and torque that suited the chassis.I've repeated myself because you continue to come up with different angles to back up your claims that BMW has lost its way. I cant find that any of your positions are in line with reality....
So once again (to repeat myself) lets review your claims and why they are not valid:
You've claimed the M235i is soft...The claim is not backed up by numbers and virtually any professional driver and or reviewer that has reviewed the cars...
You've claimed the M235i is softer than your 135i...The claim is not backed up because the M235i numbers compete with the M1 and not the 135.
You've claimed BMW has lost their way...The claim is not backed up because its still beating Mercedes and Cadillac that have spent boat loads trying to beat M series. They are still the undisputed king at this time and for cars in the same category (luxury performance).
You've claimed the M2 is nothing but bolt ons and doesnt required an M series team...The M2 has engine tuning and suspension tuning and track time.
You've complained about weight of the M2...Almost all global cars are ballooning in weight because of the different regions compliance and safety measures. BMW could have lowered the weight with significant usage of Carbon fiber. If they had I bet you would be blasting BMW for a 65-70k M2 and calling them "crazy" for their price point.
You've compared BMW and Fords performance...You are comparing a domestic company and a luxury German manufacturer. The companies spend money in completely different areas. You arent comparing apples to apples. If you want a stripper performance car and thats what you are after, you should buy it.
In the end I havent really seen any solid position from you thats accurate about BMW or in line with reality...If you are comparing Ford and BMW then you are never going to find value in BMW because you want different things than BMW produces....The reality is that you are not in the market for a BMW and Im not sure, outside of buying one, you ever were. I think you like the idea of BMW as an performance enthusiast but dont actually want a German luxury performance car. You should skip the M2 test drive and buy a Ford because you will be happier. Fords performance division is on fire and they are great cars for the segment.
Take it easy..Im out.
The newer turbo BMW's make more power and torque than the older naturally aspirated ones, are faster around the track, but the power now overwhelms the chassis. The cars aren't as sorted as they used to be. The engines sounds pretty bad. The steering feel is not as good as in the past.
If you didn't want any of that, and instead wanted the refined interior, dealer/ownership experience, then BMW would still be an excellent choice. However, for those who wanted the engagement that they used to provide, BMW has definitely lost their way. Heck, I don't think the 3-series even made the C&D top 10 this year (the M235 did though, which means that it is probably the best choice for those still wanting the "old" BMW feeling).
It is nice that Ford and GM are both making cars (GT350 and new Camaro), that combine the power and handling in a very engaging overall combination, with excellent chassis tuning, passable interiors and materials, and great overall value.
Of the current crop of BMW's, the M235 and M2 are probably the most interesting, but I've placed my order with the GT350. If an updated version of the E90 M3 were still around, the decision may have been much more difficult.
-T
Sponsored