sonicc
Mr. Bond
Interesting.
It seems like roll-over would still be a concern.
Sponsored
That would be true with any harness though. The Pro version is HANS compatible, so you could run it with that and a cage.Interesting.
It seems like roll-over would still be a concern.
That's true, but with a 6pt harness you need a roll cage, so you have that protecting you. With 4pt harness you're strapped in there tight but have no rollcage protecting you in case of a rollover.That would be true with any harness though.
I think if you are a serious track guy, you're either doing a full 6 pt and cage or you do the Pro version and HANS. I mainly want them for autocross so I'm not flying around.That's true, but with a 6pt harness you need a roll cage, so you have that protecting you. With 4pt harness you're strapped in there tight but have no rollcage protecting you in case of a rollover.
I'm just trying to poke some holes in this idea, because this seems like a very good value and I'm trying to find reasons why I shouldn't get it
Having been in a rollover, technically a vault I guess seeing as I launched airborne when the right front wheel impacted and landed on the side facing the opposite direction, there will be no leaning to avoid a roof collapse during a crash. Your body is going to be going wherever the laws of physics dictate.Isn't using 4 point harness putting you at a greater risk due to "submarining" in case of a crash? Also in case of a roll-over you'd be in a bad situation if the roof collapses since you can't lean to the side and have no roll bar to protect you.
The 3pt seatbelt has more slack so it allows more movement than the 4pt Schroth.Having been in a rollover, technically a vault I guess seeing as I launched airborne when the right front wheel impacted and landed on the side facing the opposite direction, there will be no leaning to avoid a roof collapse during a crash. Your body is going to be going wherever the laws of physics dictate.