Snide
Member
:amen:I am well aware, the post was about the stock 235's. Being able to cut mid 1.7 60' with a stock suspension, stock 235 tires with a stick makes the tires not shit. :cheers:
Sponsored
:amen:I am well aware, the post was about the stock 235's. Being able to cut mid 1.7 60' with a stock suspension, stock 235 tires with a stick makes the tires not shit. :cheers:
1.7 60 foots with 235 all seasons? Yeah ok :lol:I am well aware, the post was about the stock 235's. Being able to cut mid 1.7 60' with a stock suspension, stock 235 tires with a stick makes the tires not shit. :cheers:
In theory, that's all true, but it in the case of this quite heavy and powerful car, the load applied to the contact patch of the 235 tires easily exceeds their capability and actually lowers the coefficient of friction between tire and road.In theory, the width of the tire doesn't matter given the same tire pressure since the contact surface area doesn't change. In fact, it is possible that a skinnier tire may produce better traction than the wider tire since the contact patch would be longer in the longitudinal direction than on the wider tire. There is a car and driver article out there somewhere that verifies this.
1.7 60 foots with 235 all seasons? Yeah ok :lol:
Pick up a set of PP wheels and tires. Plenty of people are selling them on the cheap
I've seen perfect sets sell for $800.
Actual tread contact pressure with the ground varies so widely over the contact patch that estimating contact surface area from inflation pressure probably isn't worth the time spent running the numbers. You can't do a "weight divided by inflation pressure" calculation even for a tire with no tread at all running at zero camber and expect the answer to actually be meaningful.In theory, the width of the tire doesn't matter given the same tire pressure since the contact surface area doesn't change.