Sponsored

2017 CHEVROLET CAMARO ZL1 VS. 2017 FORD MUSTANG SHELBY GT350R: THE FOREVER WAR

Zitrosounds

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Threads
67
Messages
3,411
Reaction score
2,164
Location
Madison, AL
First Name
Harold
Vehicle(s)
16 GT350R/16 GT350TP/15 GT-PP/12 GT-PP
If you were joking then fine. But there was no indication that you were. At least none that I could see. Plus with J_Maher saying I was a bit biased and along with all the flack I already took in this thread it shouldn't be any wonder that I would have that reaction.

But in any case, the R exhibited more of what MT was in favor of. I agree with them based on the way they did it. And in a way I am glad they did it that way. Because it wasn't just a performance comparison...performance was just one of the things each car was graded on. I thought it was done very well and I thought MT gave great explanations and descriptions on each car.
I agree. I think both cars are Stellar and amazing what they do for their price bracket. Really boils down to what you prefer in a car
Sponsored

 

roygriffin2020

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
May 27, 2017
Threads
24
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
339
Location
North America
Vehicle(s)
Big Red reincarnated
I agree. I think both cars are Stellar and amazing what they do for their price bracket. Really boils down to what you prefer in a car
Mmmmm, food for thought purchase... I see there are a lot of 2016 GT350's to choose from hanging around from last year, even some R's.
 

GTthree50

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Threads
25
Messages
806
Reaction score
465
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Vehicle(s)
Magnetic Grey 2017 GT350
I agree. I think both cars are Stellar and amazing what they do for their price bracket. Really boils down to what you prefer in a car
Totally agree. The Shelby offers everything I wanted in a car if I could not have a 991.2 GT3. That car is cost prohibitive. While as a performance car the Camaro is fine but it misses the mark for my taste. I dislike the exterior and flat hate the dash design as well as not caring for the small block engines exhaust note. I'm not even sure that most of us here that own Shelby's would cross shop the Chevy's. They are fine cars just different.
 

PP0001

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Threads
53
Messages
4,889
Reaction score
5,731
Location
Both Sides of the Border
Vehicle(s)
2021 CTR LE (126 & 581)
I personally don't feel I have to have the fastest thing out there at any given time. We all know that's unrealistic unless you're very well off. What has typically worked for me is mostly luck and sticking with the right cars. I've never been upside down, nor rolled any previous loan into the next. I did take my biggest loss on a BMW I had for a month though. I always make sure I leave room to bail on a car payment if my life was to take a financial hit. This is why I care about resale and could never pay adm or sticker. In my opinion, life is too short to stick with one car. I feel fortunate to be living in this era and have a good income. So I'm gonna try all the cars I can while I'm young. Besides the BMW, I don't regret any car that I've had. P.S. I come in peace with this post. Just giving insight to how it should work out if you're smart with the purchases.
Hey mdmoore23, thanks for coming over to my place last night as I really enjoyed your company and also your outstanding 2017 ZL1.

As I mentioned to you last night my favorite color of cars has and always will be Red and Black and when you showed up last night with your Red beast I was quite impressed.

I was also very impressed with the fit/finish and the interior of your car along with those outstanding looking wheels. The ride was better than I expected and I really enjoyed the seats in your car as well.

With 650 HP of course I expected your car to be fast and when you launched your ZL1 with the 10 speed automatic from a dead stop I could tell that this was a low 11 second/~120+ MPH car in the quarter mile. Very impressive acceleration and the ride quality was better than I expected as well.

Would I buy a new ZL1 based on the great ride last night along with experiencing better fit and finish etc. than I expected, probably not as I have been buying Blue Oval automobiles since the 1960's with my first car being a 1967 Cougar and have built up long standing relationships with many Ford dealerships along with numerous friends in Dearborn and Flat Rock.

Being an old school guy long standing relationships mean a lot to me therefore it would take pretty much a miracle for me to move away from the Ford brand.

Straight line your car is a beast and certainly much powerful than my R model but I would expect that my R model would be superior on a road course especially when it comes to braking, steering and handling.

As I mentioned to you last night I had previously owned a few new generation GT500 cars from 2008MY and 2009MY and once I drove my first Boss 302 in early 2011 I immediately got rid of the GT500 cars and moved over to Boss 302's and in particular the Laguna Seca model. The GT350/GT350R's have taken performance to another level but still love the Boss cars just as much.

Each to their own but I much prefer a NA HP automobile to a FI HP automobile and no matter how fast the new GT500 may be I will have no interest in a new GT500 but the ~48,000 that bought the 8MY's of the GT500 will probably be all over the new GT500 and good for them and for the FMC.

Having said all that I totally understand why you chose to buy your ZL1 and for many good reasons. You have an outstanding automobile especially for someone so young and exactly half of my age.

Looking forward to seeing you at the next Cars and Coffee and hope that you enjoyed the ride in my Pilot Production Boss 302 last night as they are pretty cool cars as well.

:thumbsup::thumbsup:
 

J_Maher_AMG

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
1,475
Reaction score
1,197
Location
Newfoundland, Canada
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350R (HR057)
You guys REALLY are something else. So because I mistook what they said and despite the fact that I once again acknowledged the results of the test, somehow that little slip up is me showing some "bias"? You guys...man there just isn't any reasoning with any of you.
And nevermind that in my comment I was defending the win of the GT350R over the ZL1. Just forget that part right? Just completely ignore that I was providing justification as to why MT named the GT350R as the winner. That doesn't matter does it? What mattered is that I accidentally said "Muscle Car" right? Despite that I said it felt better and had more of the characteristics that most guys would prefer. None of that mattered. Are you kidding me??!!
Woah. Well then.

For starters there my friend, I have clearly, VERY clearly, stated more often than anyone else here, that I don't mind your debates, your points, or your mannerisms.

All of your posts have defended your views well IMO, and nowhere can you quote me saying anywhere that you ignored this or that.

I made a single remark that A) Nothing was said about the 350R being a muscle car, and B) they also didn't call the ZL1 a luxury car. Considering that calling the 350R a muscle car (im NOT saying that you called it one, but you did reference it as) would associate negatively with what the car truly is, and the fact that calling the ZL1 a luxury car would be elevating the car from what it actually is.

Combine the slight - to the R and + to the ZL1, when neither are true, is what made me think a slight bias was introduced. We see it all the time on here and other sites, but when there is a little bit of bias or "fanboyism" introduced, slight nudging of the positive/negative connotations of the car is what reduces the objectivity of the post.

Considering how others have responded to you and how often I've defended you, that you would go off on a tangent after a single remark that IMO wasn't the end of the world or untrue, is a little surprising and disappointing. Especially considering I never alluded to or suggested half of what you just said. If you can't take a tiny bit of what I would consider constructive criticism, then maybe you should refrain from further debating.
 

Sponsored

4V Mayhem

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
528
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium M6
Woah. Well then.

For starters there my friend, I have clearly, VERY clearly, stated more often than anyone else here, that I don't mind your debates, your points, or your mannerisms.

All of your posts have defended your views well IMO, and nowhere can you quote me saying anywhere that you ignored this or that.

I made a single remark that A) Nothing was said about the 350R being a muscle car, and B) they also didn't call the ZL1 a luxury car. Considering that calling the 350R a muscle car (im NOT saying that you called it one, but you did reference it as) would associate negatively with what the car truly is, and the fact that calling the ZL1 a luxury car would be elevating the car from what it actually is.

Combine the slight - to the R and + to the ZL1, when neither are true, is what made me think a slight bias was introduced. We see it all the time on here and other sites, but when there is a little bit of bias or "fanboyism" introduced, slight nudging of the positive/negative connotations of the car is what reduces the objectivity of the post.

Considering how others have responded to you and how often I've defended you, that you would go off on a tangent after a single remark that IMO wasn't the end of the world or untrue, is a little surprising and disappointing. Especially considering I never alluded to or suggested half of what you just said. If you can't take a tiny bit of what I would consider constructive criticism, then maybe you should refrain from further debating.
They said "From the driver’s seat, the ZL1 is almost a luxury car.". That is what I was referring to when I said that the ZL1 had more of a luxury car feel. I personally didn't think that was elevating it. If anything I think they meant it negatively. And I certainly wasn't mentioning it to give the ZL1 a compliment. When I said the R had more of a Muscle Car feel, I was repeating what they were saying except I must've gotten "Muscle Car" and "Sports Car" mixed up and said the wrong one. But these terms get thrown around and interchanged soo often that it is very easy to mix it up. But in any case, that is what they thought of both cars and that is why they preferred the R over the ZL1. If someone is looking for a "Sports Car" feel and wants the higher revs for extreme cornering, then the R or even the standard GT350 will give you that. The ZL1 won't. So it really comes down to what each individual would want in a car. Getting around a lap faster is fine. But since none of us are doing this for money, a faster time means nothing if it is in a car you can't enjoy. Especially a $60,000 car. Regardless of the car, you'd be misreable if you spent that kind of money and didn't enjoy the feel of it. Which is why I agree with the owners in their choice of the R over a ZL1. Because they bought it to enjoy it. If you enjoy the R but instead spend money on a ZL1 hoping the performance will sway you then that is a waste of money and you'll be disappointed. And of course there is much more to the R than just a high revving engine. I just mentioned that to make a point.
 

mdmoore23

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Threads
3
Messages
375
Reaction score
278
Location
Graniteville, SC
Vehicle(s)
2017 ZL1
Hey mdmoore23, thanks for coming over to my place last night as I really enjoyed your company and also your outstanding 2017 ZL1.

As I mentioned to you last night my favorite color of cars has and always will be Red and Black and when you showed up last night with your Red beast I was quite impressed.

I was also very impressed with the fit/finish and the interior of your car along with those outstanding looking wheels. The ride was better than I expected and I really enjoyed the seats in your car as well.

With 650 HP of course I expected your car to be fast and when you launched your ZL1 with the 10 speed automatic from a dead stop I could tell that this was a low 11 second/~120+ MPH car in the quarter mile. Very impressive acceleration and the ride quality was better than I expected as well.

Would I buy a new ZL1 based on the great ride last night along with experiencing better fit and finish etc. than I expected, probably not as I have been buying Blue Oval automobiles since the 1960's with my first car being a 1967 Cougar and have built up long standing relationships with many Ford dealerships along with numerous friends in Dearborn and Flat Rock.

Being an old school guy long standing relationships mean a lot to me therefore it would take pretty much a miracle for me to move away from the Ford brand.

Straight line your car is a beast and certainly much powerful than my R model but I would expect that my R model would be superior on a road course especially when it comes to braking, steering and handling.

As I mentioned to you last night I had previously owned a few new generation GT500 cars from 2008MY and 2009MY and once I drove my first Boss 302 in early 2011 I immediately got rid of the GT500 cars and moved over to Boss 302's and in particular the Laguna Seca model. The GT350/GT350R's have taken performance to another level but still love the Boss cars just as much.

Each to their own but I much prefer a NA HP automobile to a FI HP automobile and no matter how fast the new GT500 may be I will have no interest in a new GT500 but the ~48,000 that bought the 8MY's of the GT500 will probably be all over the new GT500 and good for them and for the FMC.

Having said all that I totally understand why you chose to buy your ZL1 and for many good reasons. You have an outstanding automobile especially for someone so young and exactly half of my age.

Looking forward to seeing you at the next Cars and Coffee and hope that you enjoyed the ride in my Pilot Production Boss 302 last night as they are pretty cool cars as well.

:thumbsup::thumbsup:
Thanks for the kind words. You are definitely one of the more stand up car enthusiasts that I've met. I have great respect for your opinion on cars, as it's obvious you have experienced some of the best. Our meeting last night reinforced what's really great about this era. The "pony car" doesn't have to be defended with quotes like "good for the price" anymore. What Chevy and Ford are producing today on the performance front is just good. There are no excuses needed anymore, in my opinion. Anyone not willing to do what we did, and share these great machines, is losing out. This thread has gone off track at times, but I truly enjoy a car debate. We all want our cars to win just like our sports teams. I can honestly say that I can see why the GT350 has a following, just from riding in your Boss. While I will pretty much always choose the forced induction car, I understand the appeal of what Ford has brought to market. Probably my second favorite car was NA. I had a 2008 Z06 a few years ago, and revving that 427 to 7000 rpm was very riveting. I won't be satisfied until I get a ride in an R though. I wanna see what all the fuss is about.
 

PP0001

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Threads
53
Messages
4,889
Reaction score
5,731
Location
Both Sides of the Border
Vehicle(s)
2021 CTR LE (126 & 581)
Thanks for the kind words. You are definitely one of the more stand up car enthusiasts that I've met. I have great respect for your opinion on cars, as it's obvious you have experienced some of the best. Our meeting last night reinforced what's really great about this era. The "pony car" doesn't have to be defended with quotes like "good for the price" anymore. What Chevy and Ford are producing today on the performance front is just good. There are no excuses needed anymore, in my opinion. Anyone not willing to do what we did, and share these great machines, is losing out. This thread has gone off track at times, but I truly enjoy a car debate. We all want our cars to win just like our sports teams. I can honestly say that I can see why the GT350 has a following, just from riding in your Boss. While I will pretty much always choose the forced induction car, I understand the appeal of what Ford has brought to market. Probably my second favorite car was NA. I had a 2008 Z06 a few years ago, and revving that 427 to 7000 rpm was very riveting. I won't be satisfied until I get a ride in an R though. I wanna see what all the fuss is about.
It's interesting that the "Pony Car" wars never really got going until General Motors came out with the Camaro and Firebird some 50 years ago with the 1967 Camaro and 1967 Firebird.

IMO if it wasn't for the 1967 Camaro Z28 being produced we probably would not have had a 1969/1970 Boss 302 so thanks GM for that!

Yes, the Plymouth Barracuda was the very first Pony Car produced (Barracuda came out ~2 weeks earlier than the Mustang) but it was Ford and GM that has really duked it out over the last 50 years when it came to the Pony Car Wars.

I was brought up in a single parent environment so we had very little money but I had a cousin who's Father bought him in high school a 1967 Firebird Sprint convertible that came with an OHC 6 cylinder engine and was equipped with a 4 barrel Quadrajet carb and a 4 speed tranny. I was in heaven when I rode in my cousin's car and what a great Pony Car back in the day.

When we first rode in your ZL1 last night it really hit home with me as to how much the Mustang and Camaro have evolved over the 5 or 6 years.

It was not long ago (2009) that the new generation Boss 302 was given full approval from the Ford executive to proceed with the internal code name being "Project 747" which was a tribute to Alan Mulally who had previously come from Boeing and with the Boeing 747 aircraft debuting in 1969 just like the original Boss 302 thus "Project 747" was launched.

The 2012 Boss 302 that you rode in last night was assembled back in October 2010 with the Coyote engine for that car being built in late July 2010. Obviously both the engine and car were pre production units and it was interesting to see how much advancement in engineering has taken place between your 2017 ZL1 and my 2012 Boss 302 over the last ~6 years..

That takes us to your 2017 ZL1 and the tremendous strides that GM has taken with respect to not only a very powerful engine but all other power train aspects including that outstanding 10 speed automatic transmission.

Let's just say that these 2 cars were developed just 6 years apart, can you imagine what we could expect in another 6 years from the Pony Car Wars assuming that the internal combustion engine is still alive and well in the year 2023??

See you at Cars and Coffee very soon and I will arrange for you to take a rip in a 2016 or 2017 R model and promise you that you will be very impressed no matter who is doing the driving!!

:thumbsup::thumbsup:
 

mdmoore23

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Threads
3
Messages
375
Reaction score
278
Location
Graniteville, SC
Vehicle(s)
2017 ZL1
It's interesting that the "Pony Car" wars never really got going until General Motors came out with the Camaro and Firebird some 50 years ago with the 1967 Camaro and 1967 Firebird.

IMO if it wasn't for the 1967 Camaro Z28 being produced we probably would not have had a 1969/1970 Boss 302 so thanks GM for that!

Yes, the Plymouth Barracuda was the very first Pony Car produced (Barracuda came out ~2 weeks earlier than the Mustang) but it was Ford and GM that has really duked it out over the last 50 years when it came to the Pony Car Wars.

I was brought up in a single parent environment so we had very little money but I had a cousin who's Father bought him in high school a 1967 Firebird Sprint convertible that came with an OHC 6 cylinder engine and was equipped with a 4 barrel Quadrajet carb and a 4 speed tranny. I was in heaven when I rode in my cousin's car and what a great Pony Car back in the day.

When we first rode in your ZL1 last night it really hit home with me as to how much the Mustang and Camaro have evolved over the 5 or 6 years.

It was not long ago (2009) that the new generation Boss 302 was given full approval from the Ford executive to proceed with the internal code name being "Project 747" which was a tribute to Alan Mulally who had previously come from Boeing and with the Boeing 747 aircraft debuting in 1969 just like the original Boss 302 thus "Project 747" was launched.

The 2012 Boss 302 that you rode in last night was assembled back in October 2010 with the Coyote engine for that car being built in late July 2010. Obviously both the engine and car were pre production units and it was interesting to see how much advancement in engineering has taken place between your 2017 ZL1 and my 2012 Boss 302 over the last ~6 years..

That takes us to your 2017 ZL1 and the tremendous strides that GM has taken with respect to not only a very powerful engine but all other power train aspects including that outstanding 10 speed automatic transmission.

Let's just say that these 2 cars were developed just 6 years apart, can you imagine what we could expect in another 6 years from the Pony Car Wars assuming that the internal combustion engine is still alive and well in the year 2023??

See you at Cars and Coffee very soon and I will arrange for you to take a rip in a 2016 or 2017 R model and promise you that you will be very impressed no matter who is doing the driving!!

:thumbsup::thumbsup:
:cheers:
 

4V Mayhem

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
528
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium M6
It's interesting that the "Pony Car" wars never really got going until General Motors came out with the Camaro and Firebird some 50 years ago with the 1967 Camaro and 1967 Firebird.

IMO if it wasn't for the 1967 Camaro Z28 being produced we probably would not have had a 1969/1970 Boss 302 so thanks GM for that!

Yes, the Plymouth Barracuda was the very first Pony Car produced (Barracuda came out ~2 weeks earlier than the Mustang) but it was Ford and GM that has really duked it out over the last 50 years when it came to the Pony Car Wars.

I was brought up in a single parent environment so we had very little money but I had a cousin who's Father bought him in high school a 1967 Firebird Sprint convertible that came with an OHC 6 cylinder engine and was equipped with a 4 barrel Quadrajet carb and a 4 speed tranny. I was in heaven when I rode in my cousin's car and what a great Pony Car back in the day.

When we first rode in your ZL1 last night it really hit home with me as to how much the Mustang and Camaro have evolved over the 5 or 6 years.

It was not long ago (2009) that the new generation Boss 302 was given full approval from the Ford executive to proceed with the internal code name being "Project 747" which was a tribute to Alan Mulally who had previously come from Boeing and with the Boeing 747 aircraft debuting in 1969 just like the original Boss 302 thus "Project 747" was launched.

The 2012 Boss 302 that you rode in last night was assembled back in October 2010 with the Coyote engine for that car being built in late July 2010. Obviously both the engine and car were pre production units and it was interesting to see how much advancement in engineering has taken place between your 2017 ZL1 and my 2012 Boss 302 over the last ~6 years..

That takes us to your 2017 ZL1 and the tremendous strides that GM has taken with respect to not only a very powerful engine but all other power train aspects including that outstanding 10 speed automatic transmission.

Let's just say that these 2 cars were developed just 6 years apart, can you imagine what we could expect in another 6 years from the Pony Car Wars assuming that the internal combustion engine is still alive and well in the year 2023??

See you at Cars and Coffee very soon and I will arrange for you to take a rip in a 2016 or 2017 R model and promise you that you will be very impressed no matter who is doing the driving!!

:thumbsup::thumbsup:
What I like is that there is something for everyone these days when it comes to cars. If you want a straight line monster then theres the Hellcat. If you want extreme cornering and high revs then you have the GT350/GT350R. If you want something that does well all around then you have the ZL1. And of course there are others like the Z06, GTR, Viper, and others. I say this because despite your particular tastes and preferences, the ride in the ZL1 impressed you. Even if you would never care to own one you still enjoyed it. Same with ZL1 owners who experience the GT350R. Even if it isn't their cup of tea as far as ownership, I feel that most would enjoy the car. Hellcat as well. And all this really shows how each of these cars cater to different types.

I think that in previous generations Mustangs and Camaros were all pretty much the same and it came down to who likes Ford and who likes Chevy. But these days these cars are approaching performance from entirely different angles. And these cars are soo much more than just an engine or just suspension. they are designed precisely to excel in certain areas which makes up for the deficits they have in other areas. It really all about the entire car and the way they approach performance and what the buyer prefers. I personally preferred the Zl1s approach. But again, these cars are soo specific in what they do and how they do it. At least thats my take on it.
 

Sponsored

ElAntonius

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2016
Threads
0
Messages
68
Reaction score
121
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350 (Grabber Blue, Electronics)
While I generally agree, I do find it funny that in this day and age 526 hp is a deficit :headbang:

I'm a young'un (33) and I remember when 400hp was a big freakin' deal. Hell, my '10 Camaro had that much and I and many others were FREAKING OUT about it. That was supercharged V8 hp not that long ago.
 

J_Maher_AMG

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
1,475
Reaction score
1,197
Location
Newfoundland, Canada
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350R (HR057)
While I generally agree, I do find it funny that in this day and age 526 hp is a deficit :headbang:

I'm a young'un (33) and I remember when 400hp was a big freakin' deal. Hell, my '10 Camaro had that much and I and many others were FREAKING OUT about it. That was supercharged V8 hp not that long ago.
I'm probably an oddball in that I don't think that the car needs any more power than it has. More power could be fun, and especially on a track where it can be used, but for street use I think the ~7.0lbs/hp ratio is near ideal. Hell even a little less (think last gen Cayman GTS) most reviewers said it was near perfect and often brought up the "how much more sports car do you really need"?

It is enough to have serious fun with on back roads, but at the same time it isn't too much that its too scary to use either. I think a Z06 or a ZL1 would be a blast with all that power, but I know that I would be much, much more conscious of it when pushing the car a little on back roads, aka more stressful IMO, and that isn't a bad thing if you enjoy that. As many have said, its more fun to drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow :cheers:
 

4V Mayhem

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
528
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium M6
While I generally agree, I do find it funny that in this day and age 526 hp is a deficit :headbang:

I'm a young'un (33) and I remember when 400hp was a big freakin' deal. Hell, my '10 Camaro had that much and I and many others were FREAKING OUT about it. That was supercharged V8 hp not that long ago.

I'm probably an oddball in that I don't think that the car needs any more power than it has. More power could be fun, and especially on a track where it can be used, but for street use I think the ~7.0lbs/hp ratio is near ideal. Hell even a little less (think last gen Cayman GTS) most reviewers said it was near perfect and often brought up the "how much more sports car do you really need"?

It is enough to have serious fun with on back roads, but at the same time it isn't too much that its too scary to use either. I think a Z06 or a ZL1 would be a blast with all that power, but I know that I would be much, much more conscious of it when pushing the car a little on back roads, aka more stressful IMO, and that isn't a bad thing if you enjoy that. As many have said, its more fun to drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow :cheers:
I feel that we're gonna start seeing the top dogs having 650 minimum and the SS/GT models will be around 450-500 minimum. These cars have come soo far and really are pushing limits more than ever before. I mean, really, compared to 707 and 808/840 in the Dodge vehicles...along with the Trackhawk coming out with 707 as well, by comparison even the 650 on the ZL1 seems low. It just makes me wonder where we'll be in 10-15 years from now. Considering that 10 years ago the GT had 315 hp and the GT500 had 550. Now we have NA engines making almost that much.
 

roygriffin2020

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
May 27, 2017
Threads
24
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
339
Location
North America
Vehicle(s)
Big Red reincarnated
I feel that we're gonna start seeing the top dogs having 650 minimum and the SS/GT models will be around 450-500 minimum. These cars have come soo far and really are pushing limits more than ever before. I mean, really, compared to 707 and 808/840 in the Dodge vehicles...along with the Trackhawk coming out with 707 as well, by comparison even the 650 on the ZL1 seems low. It just makes me wonder where we'll be in 10-15 years from now. Considering that 10 years ago the GT had 315 hp and the GT500 had 550. Now we have NA engines making almost that much.
With the current Ford Performance crate motors of 500+ HP, it is already there ready to go. It only goes up..


https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6007-A52XS
 

Epiphany

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Threads
69
Messages
7,488
Reaction score
11,746
Location
Global
Vehicle(s)
I like to disassemble things.
Considering that 10 years ago the GT had 315 hp and the GT500 had 550. Now we have NA engines making almost that much.
Ten years ago the GT500 was only 500hp (2007-2009). The 2010 MY brought 540hp. 2011/2012 got a bump to 550hp and in '13/'14 it was 662hp.

You are on point about NA engines making what FI engines did from back than. Torque falls a bit short but beyond that I agree, we've come a long way.
Sponsored

 
 




Top