Mazman
Well-Known Member
Doesn't 16-17% loss sound rather high for that transmission setup?
So much for break in periods
seems to be running well after all
So much for break in periods
seems to be running well after allSponsored
Sponsored
Gibbo205
Well-Known Member
They are around 12%, its a modern wet auto, so loses nowhere near 17%.Doesn't 16-17% loss sound rather high for that transmission setup?
So much for break in periods
Car is around 475HP crank on that dyno, the cold weather would have helped perk up the numbers too.
Not taking anything away from the car though as 119mph trap speed says it all, these cars are damn quick with the A10, but they are not 500HP.
MrWolf
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2015
- Threads
- 37
- Messages
- 1,502
- Reaction score
- 532
- Location
- UK - Wiltshire
- First Name
- Tom
- Vehicle(s)
- MY2018 Magnetic Auto GT
Math is slightly out.
425whp, with a 12% loss is 482hp
425 x 100 / 88 = 482
(Basically 425 / 0.88)
Rather than what most people do (incorrectly)
425 x 1.12 = 476
Either way, if right, it’s more then 460
425whp, with a 12% loss is 482hp
425 x 100 / 88 = 482
(Basically 425 / 0.88)
Rather than what most people do (incorrectly)
425 x 1.12 = 476
Either way, if right, it’s more then 460
...and there there will be a diff cooler on a non 5.2L S550...:bolt:
Spill it :gossip:
Sponsored
ypena02
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2015
- Threads
- 27
- Messages
- 787
- Reaction score
- 200
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 Mustang GT
119 in like -1500 DA lol Still impressive though.
l'Ingegnere
Well-Known Member
This forum continues to make my head hurt worse every time '18 power figures come up. You all are operating under a massive assumption that a tuners -chassis- dyno (calibrated to whatever specification or not) will 100% accurately correspond to the -engine- dyno that Ford used to certify the engine.
This is wishful thinking. If you trust a tuner's number over Ford's numbers, this is also wishful thinking.
/rant
This is wishful thinking. If you trust a tuner's number over Ford's numbers, this is also wishful thinking.
/rant
l'Ingegnere
Well-Known Member
Not really an assumption for me, but let's leave it at that. You may believe whatever makes you happy.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2016
- Threads
- 115
- Messages
- 5,682
- Reaction score
- 4,411
- Location
- Northern Virginia
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 PP1 GT Kona
- Banned
- #25
I just watched a YouTube video where a 2018 PP car did 120+MPH in the 1/4. But now I can't find the damned video.
I'll keep looking.
I'll keep looking.
Sponsored
Marino
Well-Known Member
Just because a manufacturer rates a car at a power level doesn't mean it can't make much more than that number. Where they could get in trouble is if it makes less than the advertised power number. It's clear Ford underrated their power numbers. So many people in denial! :cheers:
l'Ingegnere
Well-Known Member
So many people in delusion...
l'Ingegnere
Well-Known Member
I thought it was 625?