raptor17GT
Well-Known Member
wow, I didn't know Prince Harry owned a Mustang and is a member is on here. Amazing the things you learn.
Sponsored
Aside from not knowing the difference between maths (sic) and chemistry, it sounds like you were out sick for grade, high and university school. Trees and coal do NOT sequester CO2.Once again explained to you over and over again. Trees sequester CO2 - correct. Burning trees releases the CO2 - correct (the same CO2) = short term cycle.
Burning oil and coal releases CO2 sequestered millions of years ago and cannot be re-sequestered back into fossil fuels for millions of years if at all.
It really is primary school maths but that will probably be a stretch for you.
???We know, and thatās the problem.
If you understood it, you might care. No guarantee of course.
Wellā¦itās a nonsensical figure.he figure that American passenger vehicle contribute only 2.4% (less than 3%) of global carbon emissions caught my eye.
Well clearly you didn't go to school at all!Aside from not knowing the difference between maths (sic) and chemistry, it sounds like you were out sick for grade, high and university school. Trees and coal do NOT sequester CO2.
The CO2 you refer to is generated by combining carbon in those items with oxygen from the air. The CO2 was never sequestered in them.
I guess you think trees manufacture the oxygen they emit from quarks instead of getting it by breaking up CO2 already in air. Whoops, you had to be out sick on quark days too. So I guess you think trees create oxygen via voodoo. Yes, Voodoo is not just an engine.
I assume youāre talking to BJ. If so, just set him to silent. Life is much better when you donāt have to endure him.Seriously YOU are the only person bothered about this. I'm having a sensible discussion and you keep popping up posting drivel like a stuck record.
I have no idea what the point is you are trying to make other than some silly 'we won the war' that nobody here cares about anyway. Things have moved on in the world since then even if you haven't.
Cato institute is nonsensical?Wellā¦itās a nonsensical figure.
Aside from not knowing the difference between maths (sic) and chemistry, it sounds like you were out sick for grade, high and university school. Trees and coal do NOT sequester CO2.
The CO2 you refer to is generated by combining carbon in those items with oxygen from the air. The CO2 was never sequestered in them.
I guess you think trees manufacture the oxygen they emit from quarks instead of getting it by breaking up CO2 already in air. Whoops, you had to be out sick on quark days too. So I guess you think trees create oxygen via voodoo. Yes, Voodoo is not just an engine.