RocketGuy3
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
It seems they're building upon the previous test with just the Z and Mach 1 (as they re-use the performance test data), but given the extra contenders and new content, I figured it was worth a new thread. They also touch on how/why the Mach 1 might have been slower than previous ones they've tested, but I don't think the explanation is probably sufficient on it's own... I doubt 91 octane robs you of THAT much power vs 93.
... And I still wish they had tested the non-handling-pack Mach 1.
https://www.caranddriver.com/review...nissan-z-vs-2022-toyota-gr-supra-30-compared/
... And I still wish they had tested the non-handling-pack Mach 1.
https://www.caranddriver.com/review...nissan-z-vs-2022-toyota-gr-supra-30-compared/
Sponsored