StangTime
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
- Threads
- 77
- Messages
- 3,508
- Reaction score
- 3,933
- Location
- Ontario 🇨🇦
- First Name
- Todd
- Vehicle(s)
- 19' GT PP1 Manual
- Thread starter
- #136
That 2.7V number I found on another forum by someone who measured it on a scope. They may have confused peak voltage with RMS. So my post should actually say RMS not peak. 2.7V peak would be 1.9V RMS. Either way something is not adding up. That number still seems low. My DSP, only has high-level balanced inputs and responds to a signal voltage range of 2V to 15V RMS as posted in the specifications section. On the input gain dial 2V is max and 15V is min. During setup, the DSP has you play a provided test track at max volume. The gains on the DSP input are turned up until the signal clip LED lights start flashing. Those dials ended up at nearly max which would correspond to approximately 3V RMS. Hmmm....Everything is correct, except for the fact, that it's not 2.7V peak, but ~5V peak output from the ACM. ;)
And the reason why the ACM has a signal on both the positive and negative conductor is, that it's in fact just a stepped down (i.e. lowered voltage) high level Bridge Tied Load (BTL) output.
By the fact that you can reprogramm the ACM for both high- and lower level output just means that the high-level signal is stepped down from approx. 10V output to approx. 5V output. Otherwise it would have only a signal on the positive conductor and this would mean a different electrical circuit inside the ACM which is very unlikely due to the added cost that this additional circuit would generate (especially as the different signals are all sent out over the same wires in the corresponding connector, this would mean some serious reengineering of the ACM).
Frank Miketta (CTO Gladen and Mosconi) and me found that out while debugging some white noise issues in my installation with the Mosconi Pico 8/10 DSP amplifier while using the DSR1 as integration device.
We measured the voltages of both positive and negative conductor and the result was, that it's a simple BTL circuit with reduced voltage (that is then non-clipping as it's not driven into the technical limits of the circuit).
When you measure a high-level ACM you can clearly see, that at 5V output the high-level output is also not clipping, so when reprogrammed you only drive the ACM to half of its maximum output.
Pulling the DSR1 out of the signal chain and reconfiguring the Mosconi Pico 8/10 to high-level input (this amp can do high-level input with low-level signals!) almost completely removed the white noise issue in mids and tweeters in my installation.
Just for information for all of you.
In the videos you posted he is measuring a 2014 SONY ACM and getting a 5V PEAK voltage. 5V peak equals 3.5V RMS. The Sony is also measuring flat output down low whereas the system in the 2015 and up (I believe is made by Clarion) has the undefeatable bass hump at lower levels as measured by your Mosconi.
How did you measure your signals? With the Mosconi?
I'm curious about something now. If I re-program my ACM for high-level output (10V peak or 7V RMS) I can turn down the gains on the DSP input and reduce my noise floor even more. I assume there is a DC offset on the ACM outputs between the + and - signal lines when set to high-level?
All good info as we continue to learn more about these systems.
Sponsored